Literature DB >> 7757166

Allergy to laboratory animals: a follow up study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy and pre-existing sensitisation on its development.

P A Botham1, C T Lamb, E L Teasdale, S M Bonner, J A Tomenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of allergy to laboratory animals (ALA) during the first two years of employment, and to study the effect on ALA of atopy and sensitisation.
METHODS: A follow up prospective study of ALA at the Zeneca (formerly ICI) Research Laboratories.
RESULTS: The incidence of the disease during the first year of employment has remained at about 10% since the mid-1980s. This compares with an incidence of 37% in the early 1980s. The reduction in incidence and its maintenance at a lower level is thought to be due to the introduction and management of improved engineering controls, working practices, and educational programmes designed to reduce exposure to allergens from laboratory animals. The underlying incidence of immunological sensitisation to animals (the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to animal allergens) is much higher (40% after one and 53% after two years of exposure). Both atopic diathesis and presensitisation to laboratory animals increased the likelihood that a person would develop ALA.
CONCLUSION: Neither factor predicted the disease accurately so their use should be restricted to the identification of people who may be more susceptible to the development of ALA (and thus who may need to pay particular attention to the use of personal protective equipment) rather than to their exclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7757166      PMCID: PMC1128167          DOI: 10.1136/oem.52.2.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  13 in total

Review 1.  Allergy to laboratory mice and rats: a review of the pathophysiology, epidemiology and clinical aspects.

Authors:  S Hunskaar; R T Fosse
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Preemployment screening for allergy to laboratory animals: epidemiologic evaluation of its potential usefulness.

Authors:  C A Newill; R Evans; M J Khoury
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-11

3.  Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective and cross-sectional study.

Authors:  T Kibby; G Powell; J Cromer
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1989-10

4.  Reduction of airborne allergenic urinary proteins from laboratory rats.

Authors:  S Gordon; R D Tee; D Lowson; J Wallace; A J Newman Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-06

5.  Occupational allergy to laboratory animals: employer practices.

Authors:  I I Lutsky; J H Kalbfleisch; J N Fink
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1983-05

6.  Does atopy have any predictive value for laboratory animal allergy? A comparison of different concepts of atopy.

Authors:  A J Slovak; R N Hill
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-02

7.  Allergy to laboratory animals: a retrospective and a prospective study.

Authors:  G E Davies; A V Thompson; Z Niewola; G E Burrows; E L Teasdale; D J Bird; D A Phillips
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1983-11

8.  Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy on its development.

Authors:  P A Botham; G E Davies; E L Teasdale
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-09

9.  Task-related variation in airborne concentrations of laboratory animal allergens: studies with Rat n I.

Authors:  P A Eggleston; C A Newill; A A Ansari; A Pustelnik; S R Lou; R Evans; D G Marsh; J L Longbottom; M Corn
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Allergy to mice. I. Identification of two major mouse allergens (Ag 1 and Ag 3) and investigation of their possible origin.

Authors:  J A Price; J L Longbottom
Journal:  Clin Allergy       Date:  1987-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Detection of workers sensitised to high molecular weight allergens: a diagnostic study in laboratory animal workers.

Authors:  E Meijer; D E Grobbee; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Is there a need for special preventive medical check-ups in employees exposed to experimental animal dust?

Authors:  Klaus Schmid; Barbara Jüngert; Meta Hager; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Meinir Jones
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Predictors for Increased and Reduced Rat and Mouse Allergen Exposure in Laboratory Animal Facilities.

Authors:  Anne Straumfors; Wijnand Eduard; Knut Andresen; Ann Kristin Sjaastad
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 5.  Rodent allergens.

Authors:  Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.919

6.  Reuse of Disposable Isolation Gowns in Rodent Facilities during a Pandemic.

Authors:  Toi A Collins; Amanda E Sparks; Mary M Walker; Lon V Kendall; Karen M Dobos; Valerie K Bergdall; Judy M Hickman-Davis
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.706

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.