U M Guly1, C E Robertson. 1. Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether use of the active compression-decompression device improves the haemodynamics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with those of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESIGN: Prospective crossover study. SETTING: The accident and emergency department of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 36 adult patients with non-traumatic, normothermic, out of hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed during resuscitation in alternating 3 min cycles of conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), femoral arterial pressure, and acid-base analysis of central venous blood measured during the last 30 s of each 3 minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle. RESULTS: ETCO2 was monitored in 36 patients during conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation caused a significant increase in ETCO2 (P < 0.0002), indicating improved cardiac output. Arterial pressure measurement was carried out in 10 patients. Systolic pressure was significantly greater with active compression-decompression than conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P < 0.007). Central venous blood was taken for acid-base analysis in 11 patients. There was a significant increase in the central venous hydrogen ion concentration (P = 0.025) with rises in the partial pressures of carbon dioxide and oxygen, suggesting improved venous return. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with better haemodynamic status than conventional resuscitation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether use of the active compression-decompression device improves the haemodynamics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with those of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESIGN: Prospective crossover study. SETTING: The accident and emergency department of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 36 adult patients with non-traumatic, normothermic, out of hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed during resuscitation in alternating 3 min cycles of conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), femoral arterial pressure, and acid-base analysis of central venous blood measured during the last 30 s of each 3 minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle. RESULTS:ETCO2 was monitored in 36 patients during conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation caused a significant increase in ETCO2 (P < 0.0002), indicating improved cardiac output. Arterial pressure measurement was carried out in 10 patients. Systolic pressure was significantly greater with active compression-decompression than conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P < 0.007). Central venous blood was taken for acid-base analysis in 11 patients. There was a significant increase in the central venous hydrogen ion concentration (P = 0.025) with rises in the partial pressures of carbon dioxide and oxygen, suggesting improved venous return. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with better haemodynamic status than conventional resuscitation.
Authors: T J Cohen; K J Tucker; R F Redberg; K G Lurie; M C Chin; J P Dutton; M M Scheinman; N B Schiller; M L Callaham Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: T J Cohen; K J Tucker; K G Lurie; R F Redberg; J P Dutton; K A Dwyer; T M Schwab; M C Chin; A M Gelb; M M Scheinman Journal: JAMA Date: 1992-06-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mikkel T Steinberg; Jan-Aage Olsen; Morten Eriksen; Andres Neset; Per Andreas Norseng; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Lars Wik Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 2.953