Literature DB >> 7756055

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine--decubitus lateral versus anteroposterior projection in osteoporotic women: comparison to single energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm.

K Bjarnason1, L Nilas, C Hassager, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

We investigated the discriminatory ability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in the anteroposterior vs. decubitus lateral projection in 53 elderly women with at least one vertebral fracture and 63 age-matched women without fracture. Twenty-three premenopausal healthy women served as a reference group. Spine measurements were compared to forearm measurements by single energy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA). Bone mineral density (BMD) of the women with fractures was 16% lower in the AP projection and 17% lower in the decubitus lateral projection compared to age-matched women without fractures. t-Scores (deviation from normal premenopausal values in SDs) were -2.1 to -2.3 in the women without fractures, and -3.9 (AP projection), -3.1 (lateral projection) and -3.8 (forearm) in the women with vertebral fractures. t-Scores as well as z-scores for bone mineral content of the vertebral body and the vertebral posterior elements (both measured with the lateral projection) were similar. ROC analysis showed no significant difference between the AP and the lateral projection of the spine. When subjects with vertebral endplate sclerosis (about 25% in each group, with considerably elevated spinal BMD) were excluded, it did not significantly change the diagnostic abilities for fractures. We found no diagnostic advantage of the lateral projection as compared to the AP projection or forearm measurement. Future studies will reveal whether absorptiometry in the lateral projection can be improved by supine lateral scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7756055     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)00037-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  4 in total

1.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.

Authors:  G M Blake; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Lateral bone density measurements in osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D J Peacock; P Egger; P Taylor; M I Cawley; C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Anteroposterior and lateral spinal DXA for the assessment of vertebral body strength: comparison with hip and forearm measurement.

Authors:  K Bjarnason; C Hassager; O L Svendsen; H Stang; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.