Literature DB >> 7755977

Direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures by detection of the gene encoding the thermostable nuclease or the gene product.

O G Brakstad1, J A Maeland.   

Abstract

This study compares methods for direct identification of S. aureus in blood cultures by detection of the thermonuclease (TNase) of this bacterium or the nuc gene encoding it. The protein was detected by an enzyme diffusion test in o-toluidine blue DNA agar with a test time of at least 4 h, by a monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sELISA) with a test time of approximately 4 h, and by a MAb-based sandwich enzyme-linked immunofiltration assay (sELIFA) with a test time of 25-30 min (sample preparation included). The nuc gene was amplified by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with a test time (amplification plus detection) of approximately 3.5 h. The tests were optimized for direct examination of blood-containing cultures. All tests were positive with 67/67 blood cultures which grew S. aureus, negative with 35/35 cultures which grew coagulase-negative staphylococci, and negative with 37/37 cultures with various other bacteria. These results showed positive agreement with those of the commercial AccuProbe test but not with the StaphAurex agglutination kit. With an artificially seeded blood culture, minimum total times required (incubation plus testing) were as follows: nuc-PCR, 9.5 h; sELIFA, 12.5 h; enzymatic test, 16-36 h; AccuProbe, 14 h. Direct examination of both the nuc gene and the mecA gene encoding methicillin resistance demonstrated the mecA gene in all the coagulase-negative staphylococci (48.6%) which showed oxacillin resistance. The sELIFA had the particular advantage of its short test time, the PCR its high sensitivity and the possibility of simultaneous detection of the species-specific nuc gene and genes encoding other clinically important characters of the bacteria. These tests offer the prospect of direct application to a variety of clinical specimens for rapid diagnosis of S. aureus infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7755977     DOI: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1995.tb01097.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

1.  Fluorescent In situ hybridization allows rapid identification of microorganisms in blood cultures.

Authors:  V A Kempf; K Trebesius; I B Autenrieth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of four methods for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures.

Authors:  D J Speers; T R Olma; G L Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Molecular diagnostics of clinically important staphylococci.

Authors:  J Stepán; R Pantůcek; J Doskar
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Molecular characterization of a major serotype M49 group A streptococcal DNase gene (sdaD).

Authors:  A Podbielski; I Zarges; A Flosdorff; J Weber-Heynemann
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Development of a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous and rapid detection of six pathogenic bacteria in poultry.

Authors:  Zhihao Wang; Jiakun Zuo; Jiansen Gong; Jiangang Hu; Wei Jiang; Rongsheng Mi; Yan Huang; Zhaoguo Chen; Vanhnaseng Phouthapane; Kezong Qi; Chen Wang; Xiangan Han
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid.

Authors:  Johanna Marcela Vanegas Múnera; Ana María Ocampo Ríos; Daniela Montoya Urrego; Judy Natalia Jiménez Quiceno
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.257

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.