Literature DB >> 7755948

Department of veterans Affairs single-drug therapy of hypertension study. Revised figures and new data. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

B J Materson1, D J Reda, W C Cushman.   

Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy of six drugs and placebo was compared in 1292 men with untreated diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 109 mm Hg. The primary end point "success" was defined as the patient having achieved a diastolic blood pressure of < 90 mm Hg at the end of the drug titration period and having maintained a diastolic blood pressure of < 95 mm Hg for 1 year without drug intolerance. The original published success rate data (N Engl J Med 1993;328:914-921) were discovered to be in error due to a computer programming code omission (N Engl J Med 1994;330:1689). This paper presents corrected graphic figures. The corrected success rates were generally higher than originally published. Overall, diltiazem (72%) was significantly higher than hydrochlorothiazide (55%), prazosin (54%), captopril (50%), and placebo (31%); clonidine (62%) and atenolol (60%) were intermediate. There were some changes in the hierarchy of drug response, but important differences in success rates according to age by race subgroups remained. Whites responded well to all drug classes, except for lower efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide in younger whites. Blacks responded better to diltiazem than other agents. In addition, we have analyzed the data using a definition of success based on < 90 mm Hg for 1 year. Use of the <90 mm Hg criterion reduced the rate of success, but had only a minor effect on the drug success rate hierarchy. We conclude that single-drug antihypertensive therapy is effective in a majority of stage 1 to 2 diastolic hypertensive patients, although there are important age-by-race differences in success rates among various drug classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7755948     DOI: 10.1016/0895-7061(94)00196-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  39 in total

Review 1.  Diuretics as a basis of antihypertensive therapy. An overview.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Prospectively designed overviews of recent trials comparing antihypertensive regimens based on different drug classes.

Authors:  N Chapman; B Neal
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  [Arterial hypertension in patients with coronary artery disease].

Authors:  T Graf; H Schunkert
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  NICE and BHS guidelines on hypertension differ importantly.

Authors:  Neil R Poulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-27

5.  Patient Cases: 1. A Patient with Apparent Compliance.

Authors:  Pantelis A Sarafidis
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Racial differences in hypertension: implications for high blood pressure management.

Authors:  Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.378

7.  Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Christopher Jepson; David A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Combination drug treatment of hypertension: have we come full circle?

Authors:  Addison A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Drug interactions with angiotensin receptor blockers: a comparison with other antihypertensives.

Authors:  Thomas Unger; Elena Kaschina
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Optimal use of beta-blockers in high-risk hypertension: a guide to dosing equivalence.

Authors:  Janet B McGill
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.