Literature DB >> 7755066

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist administration in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: cycle performance and in vitro steroidogenesis of granulosa-lutein cells.

D Minaretzis1, M M Alper, S P Oskowitz, S M Lobel, J F Mortola, S N Pavlou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effectiveness of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist compared with an agonist in suppressing a spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer and to examine whether in vivo administration of these analogs effects granulosa-lutein cells steroidogenesis in vitro. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective case-control study included 30 healthy women undergoing ovarian hyperstimulation with human menopausal gonadotropins. Fifteen women received the Nal-Glu antagonist, 5 mg intramuscularly daily, when the lead follicle was > or = 15 mm or serum estradiol level was > or = 500 pg/ml. The control group included 15 women who underwent oocyte retrieval on the same day as the study subjects and were given the agonist leuprolide acetate, 250 micrograms subcutaneously daily, starting on cycle day 1. Granulosa-lutein cells were purified from follicular aspirates from six subjects and six controls and cultured in parallel, evaluating basal progesterone production, progesterone response to follicle-stimulating hormone or luteinizing hormone and aromatase activity.
RESULTS: No difference was demonstrated in the total amount of gonadotropins received by the two groups. Overall, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist was given for only 2.5 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SEM) days before human chorionic gonadotropin administration. The antagonist group showed significantly lower levels of serum luteinizing hormone than did the agonist group, 1.0 +/- 0.2 versus 4.2 +/- 0.5 mIU/ml (p = 0.0001) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. Serum estradiol levels were significantly lower in the antagonist than the agonist group, 820 +/- 120 versus 1361 +/- 110 pg/ml (p = 0.003) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. There was no difference in the number of retrieved oocytes, but the antagonist group had a higher proportion of mature oocytes, 82% +/- 4% versus 62.4% (p = 0.02), and a higher proportion of embryos of good quality, 69.8% +/- 9.8% versus 44.3% +/- 7.2% (p = 0.03) in the agonist group. Granulosa-lutein cells from antagonist-treated women showed significantly lower aromatase activity the first 6 hours after retrieval, 17.6 +/- 1.6 versus 31.3 +/- 7.4 ng/ml per 6 hours estradiol (p = 0.03), whereas basal and gonadotropin-stimulated with progesterone responses were similar.
CONCLUSION: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration during the late follicular phase resulted in lower serum luteinizing hormone and estradiol levels and more mature oocytes and embryos of better quality compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration. These results suggest that gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration in ovarian hyperstimulation has practical advantages over the agonist regimen. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs may have direct action on ovarian function with differential effects on granulosa-lutein cell aromatase activity. This could explain the lower serum estradiol levels routinely observed in women given gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7755066     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90490-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.211

2.  The decrease of serum luteinizing hormone level by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist following the mild IVF stimulation protocol for IVF and its clinical outcome.

Authors:  Atsushi Yanaihara; Takeshi Yorimitsu; Hiroshi Motoyama; Motohiro Ohara; Toshihiro Kawamura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  GnRH antagonist improved blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcome after multiple failures of IVF/ICSI-ET with a GnRH agonist protocol.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Takahashi; Tetsunori Mukaida; Tatsuhiro Tomiyama; Tetsuya Goto; Chikahiro Oka
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effect of in vivo GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist on hCG and insulin-stimulated progesterone production by human granulosa-lutein cells in vitro.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  ART Outcomes in GnRH Antagonist Protocol (Flexible) and Long GnRH Agonist Protocol during Early Follicular Phase in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sara Mokhtar; Mohammad Reza Sadeghi; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi; Simin Zafardoust; Bita Badenush; Farnaz Fatemi; Fattane Nazari; Koorosh Kamali; Afsaneh Mohammadzade
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  Conventional GnRH antagonist protocols versus long GnRH agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally Kadoura; Marwan Alhalabi; Abdul Hakim Nattouf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on triggering day in flexible multiple-dose protocol: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hye Jin Chang; Jung Ryeol Lee; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Won Don Lee; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2013-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.