Literature DB >> 7754087

Optimizing the use of vision in manual aiming: the role of practice.

D Elliott1, R Chua, B J Pollock, J Lyons.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how subjects learn to adjust the characteristics of their manual aiming movements in order to make optimal use of the visual information and reduce movement error. Subjects practised aiming (120 trials) with visual information available for either 400 msec or 600 msec. Following acquisition, they were transferred to conditions in which visual information was available for either more or less time. Over acquisition, subjects appeared to reduce target-aiming error by moving to the target area more quickly in order to make greater use of vision when in the vicinity of the target. With practice, there was also a reduction in the number of modifications in the movement. After transfer, both performance and kinematic data indicated that the time for which visual information was available was a more important predictor of aiming error than the similarity between training and transfer conditions. These findings are not consistent with a strong "specificity of learning" position. They also suggest that, if some sort of general representation or motor programme develops with practice, that representation includes rules or procedures for the utilization of visual feedback to allow for the on-line adjustment of the goal-directed movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7754087     DOI: 10.1080/14640749508401376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  10 in total

1.  The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Gavin P Lawrence; Ian M Franks; Eric Buckolz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Do accuracy requirements change bimanual and unimanual control processes similarly?

Authors:  Chaoyi Wang; Jason B Boyle; Boyi Dai; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual regulation of overarm throwing performance.

Authors:  M A Urbin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manual obstacle avoidance takes into account visual uncertainty, motor noise, and biomechanical costs.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; Jason C Biddle; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Seeing all the obstacles in your way: the effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching.

Authors:  Craig S Chapman; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Practice with anxiety improves performance, but only when anxious: evidence for the specificity of practice hypothesis.

Authors:  Gavin P Lawrence; Victoria E Cassell; Stuart Beattie; Tim Woodman; Michael A Khan; Lew Hardy; Vicky M Gottwald
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-27

9.  The impact of predictability on dual-task performance and implications for resource-sharing accounts.

Authors:  Laura Broeker; Harald Ewolds; Rita F de Oliveira; Stefan Künzell; Markus Raab
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-01-04

10.  Introducing a feedback training system for guided home rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fabian Kohler; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.