Literature DB >> 7754010

Trends in use of barium enema examination, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy: is use commensurate with risk of disease?

S Karasick1, S M Ehrlich, D C Levin, R J Harford, E F Rosetti, J A Ricci, L M Beam, J V Gigliotti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess replacement of barium enema examination with colonoscopy in relation to age- and sex-related risk factors, place of service, physician specialty, and cost.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1992, 894,777 insurance claims for barium enema examination and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy were retrospectively examined. Changes in use were investigated. Use of proctosigmoidoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, two office-based endoscopic procedures, was also examined.
RESULTS: Use of diagnostic colonoscopy increased from 191 to 406 services per 100,000 persons; colonoscopy with biopsy, from 77 to 183 services; and colonoscopy with lesion removal, from 77 to 202 services. Barium enema examination use declined from 929 to 511 services per 100,000 persons; diagnostic proctosigmoidoscopy, from 854 to 193 services; and diagnostic flexible sigmoidoscopy, from 656 to 620 services. Increases in use of colonoscopy in patients aged younger than 40 years were greater than overall increases.
CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy has been replacing barium enema examination as the initial colorectal examination since 1985. Increased use of colonoscopy in patients with lower risk of neoplasia suggests that indications have become overly broad.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7754010     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for "left sided" colorectal symptoms.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; I Arunkumar; A Koreli; W A Corbett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Appropriateness of indication and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: first report based on the 2000 guidelines of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Iqbal Siddique; Krishna Mohan; Fuad Hasan; Anjum Memon; Istvan Patty; Basil Al-Nakib
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose.

Authors:  Hamidreza Masjedi; Mohammad Hosein Zare; Neda Keshavarz Siahpoush; Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki; Fatemeh Alavi; Masoud Shabani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Economic comparison of current endoscopic practices: Barrett's surveillance vs. ulcerative colitis surveillance vs. biopsy for sprue vs. biopsy for microscopic colitis.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Appropriateness of colonoscopy: diagnostic yield and safety in guidelines.

Authors:  Mario Grassini; Carlo Verna; Paolo Niola; Monica Navino; Edda Battaglia; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.