Literature DB >> 7752887

Bacterial transposases and retroviral integrases.

P Polard1, M Chandler.   

Abstract

Transposable genetic elements have adopted two major strategies for their displacement from one site to another within and between genomes. One involves passage through an RNA intermediate prior to synthesis of a DNA copy while the other is limited uniquely to DNA intermediates. For both types of element, recombination reactions involved in integration are carried out by element-specific enzymes. These are called transposases in the case of DNA elements and integrases in the case of the best-characterized RNA elements, the retroviruses and retrotransposons. In spite of major differences between these two transposition strategies, one step in the process, that of insertion, appears to be chemically identical. Current evidence suggests that the similarities in integration mechanism are reflected in amino acid sequence similarities between the integrases and many transposases. These similarities are particularly marked in a region which is thought to form part of the active site, namely the DDE motif. In the light of these relationships, we attempt here to compare mechanistic aspects of retroviral integration with transposition of DNA elements and to summarize current understanding of the functional organization of integrases and transposases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7752887     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  62 in total

1.  The DDE motif in RAG-1 is contributed in trans to a single active site that catalyzes the nicking and transesterification steps of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  P C Swanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Mutational analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 identifies three catalytic amino acids in RAG1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  M A Landree; J A Wibbenmeyer; D B Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D)J recombinase.

Authors:  D R Kim; Y Dai; C L Mundy; W Yang; M A Oettinger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  A family of developmentally excised DNA elements in Tetrahymena is under selective pressure to maintain an open reading frame encoding an integrase-like protein.

Authors:  J A Gershan; K M Karrer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Isolation and characterization of Tn7 transposase gain-of-function mutants: a model for transposase activation.

Authors:  F Lu; N L Craig
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Self-generated DNA termini relax the specificity of SgrAI restriction endonuclease.

Authors:  Jurate Bitinaite; Ira Schildkraut
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Transient promoter formation: a new feedback mechanism for regulation of IS911 transposition.

Authors:  G Duval-Valentin; C Normand; V Khemici; B Marty; M Chandler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  IS1675, a novel lactococcal insertion element, forms a transposon-like structure including the lacticin 481 lantibiotic operon.

Authors:  A Dufour; A Rincé; P Uguen; J P Le Pennec
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Escherichia coli insertion sequence IS150: transposition via circular and linear intermediates.

Authors:  Markus Haas; Bodo Rak
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.