Literature DB >> 7751953

Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation.

S Y Fu1, T Gordon.   

Abstract

The effects of prolonged denervation, independent from those of prolonged axotomy, on the recovery of muscle function were examined in a nerve cross-anastomosis paradigm. The tibialis anterior muscle was denervated for various durations by cutting the common peroneal nerve before a freshly cut tibial nerve was cross-sutured to its distal stump. Nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation were quantified by means of electrophysiological and histochemical methods. Progressively fewer axons reinnervated the muscle with prolonged denervation; for example, beyond 6 months the mean (+/- SE) motor unit number was 15 +/- 4, which was far fewer than that after immediate nerve suture (137 +/- 21). The poor regeneration after prolonged denervation is not due to inability of the long-term denervated muscle to accept reinnervation because each regenerated axon reinnervated three- to fivefold more muscle fibers than normal. Rather, it is due to progressive deterioration of the intramuscular nerve sheaths because the effects of prolonged denervation were simulated by forcing regenerating axons to grow outside the sheaths. Fewer regenerated axons account for reinnervation of less than 50% of the muscle fibers in each muscle and contribute to the progressive decline in muscle force. Reinnervated muscle fibers failed to fully recover from denervation atrophy: muscle fiber cross-sectional area being 1171 +/- 84 microns2 as compared to 2700 +/- 47 microns2 after immediate nerve suture. Thus, the primary cause of the poor recovery after long-term denervation is a profound reduction in the number of axons that successfully regenerate through the deteriorating intramuscular nerve sheaths. Muscle force capacity is further compromised by the incomplete recovery of muscle fibers from denervation atrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751953      PMCID: PMC6578254     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  138 in total

1.  Factors contributing to preferential motor reinnervation in the primate peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  R D Madison; S J Archibald; R Lacin; C Krarup
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration.

Authors:  A A Al-Majed; C M Neumann; T M Brushart; T Gordon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Synergist muscle ablation and recovery from nerve-repair grafting: contractile and metabolic function.

Authors:  L M Larkin; W M Kuzon; J B Halter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-10

4.  A (heat) shock to the system promotes peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Ahmet Höke
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Overcoming endogenous constraints on neuronal regeneration.

Authors:  Nassir Mokarram; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  The use of brief post-surgical low frequency electrical stimulation to enhance nerve regeneration in clinical practice.

Authors:  K M Chan; M W T Curran; T Gordon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Quantitative analysis of muscle histologic method in rodent facial nerve injury.

Authors:  Tessa A Hadlock; Sang W Kim; Julie S Weinberg; Christopher J Knox; Marc H Hohman; James T Heaton
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Etifoxine improves peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery.

Authors:  Christelle Girard; Song Liu; Françoise Cadepond; David Adams; Catherine Lacroix; Marc Verleye; Jean-Marie Gillardin; Etienne-Emile Baulieu; Michael Schumacher; Ghislaine Schweizer-Groyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Introduction to special issue: Challenges and opportunities for regeneration in the peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Ahmet Höke; Thomas Brushart
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  PRP-1 protective effect against central and peripheral neurodegeneration following n. ischiadicus transection.

Authors:  Armen A Galoyan; John S Sarkissian; Ruben M Sulkhanyan; Vergine A Chavushyan; Zubeida A Avetisyan; Zaruhi E Avakyan; Anoush J Gevorgyan; Davit O Abrahamyan; Yuri Kh Grigorian
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.