Literature DB >> 7751952

Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged axotomy.

S Y Fu1, T Gordon.   

Abstract

The contribution of prolonged motoneuron axotomy to the poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair was determined by means of a nerve cross-anastomosis paradigm in the rat. The tibial nerve was axotomized up to 12 months before it was cross-sutured to the distal stump of the freshly cut common peroneal nerve to innervate the freshly denervated tibialis anterior muscle. Three to 17 months later, muscle and motor unit (MU) forces were measured to quantify the number of axons that had successfully regenerated and reinnervated the muscle. The extent of axonal branching was estimated by the innervation ratio (IR) (i.e., the number of muscle fibers innervated by each axon), which was obtained directly by counting muscle fibers in a single glycogen-depleted MU in each muscle and indirectly by calculation. The total number of MUs in each muscle significantly decreased with progression of axotomy and was only 35% of the control when axotomy was prolonged more than 3 months. Concurrently, MU force and IR increased exponentially, with a mean increase of threefold when axotomy was more than 3 months, which largely compensated for the reduction in the number of axons that reinnervated the muscle. Consequently, muscles reinnervated by tibial motor axons that had been axotomized up to 12 months produced as much force as those reinnervated by freshly axotomized tibial motor axons. Muscle weight, size, and muscle fiber size were similar to those after immediate nerve suture. Although prolonged axotomy does not compromise the number of muscle fibers innervated by each axon, it does reduce the capacity of motor axons to regenerate and thus is an important contributing factor to the poor functional recovery in delayed nerve repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751952      PMCID: PMC6578210     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  94 in total

1.  Factors contributing to preferential motor reinnervation in the primate peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  R D Madison; S J Archibald; R Lacin; C Krarup
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration.

Authors:  A A Al-Majed; C M Neumann; T M Brushart; T Gordon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Neurotrophic factors and their receptors in axonal regeneration and functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury.

Authors:  J Gordon Boyd; Tessa Gordon
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  A (heat) shock to the system promotes peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Ahmet Höke
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Sprouting capacity of lumbar motoneurons in normal and hemisected spinal cords of the rat.

Authors:  T Gordon; N Tyreman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Overcoming endogenous constraints on neuronal regeneration.

Authors:  Nassir Mokarram; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  The use of brief post-surgical low frequency electrical stimulation to enhance nerve regeneration in clinical practice.

Authors:  K M Chan; M W T Curran; T Gordon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Introduction to special issue: Challenges and opportunities for regeneration in the peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Ahmet Höke; Thomas Brushart
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 9.  Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Jami Scheib; Ahmet Höke
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  PRP-1 protective effect against central and peripheral neurodegeneration following n. ischiadicus transection.

Authors:  Armen A Galoyan; John S Sarkissian; Ruben M Sulkhanyan; Vergine A Chavushyan; Zubeida A Avetisyan; Zaruhi E Avakyan; Anoush J Gevorgyan; Davit O Abrahamyan; Yuri Kh Grigorian
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.