Literature DB >> 7751616

T helper 2 cells are subject to high dose oral tolerance and are not essential for its induction.

P Garside1, M Steel, E A Worthey, A Satoskar, J Alexander, H Bluethmann, F Y Liew, A M Mowat.   

Abstract

Oral administration of aqueous protein Ag results in profound immunologic tolerance, and it has been suggested previously that this reflects selective activation of Th subsets. Here we show that the induction of oral tolerance by feeding a single high dose of OVA to mice significantly reduces the production of both Th1- and Th2-dependent cytokines and is accompanied by a marked reduction of specific Abs of both the IgG2a and IgG1 isotypes in vivo. Oral tolerance was also induced normally in IL-4-deficient mice. These results indicate that both subsets of the Th cell are equally susceptible to the induction of tolerance with a single high dose of Ag delivered via the oral route and that this phenomenon does not require Th2 cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  20 in total

1.  Oral tolerance, an active immunologic process mediated by multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  H L Weiner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Effect of in vivo administration of anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody and IL-12 on the induction of low-dose oral tolerance.

Authors:  K S Barone; B Herms; L Karlosky; S Murray; J Qualls
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Tolerogenic activity of polyethylene glycol-conjugated lysozyme distinct from that of the native counterpart.

Authors:  H O Ito; T So; M Hirata; T Koga; T Ueda; T Imoto
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Oral tolerance in disease.

Authors:  P Garside; A M Mowat; A Khoruts
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Oral tolerance.

Authors:  W Strober; B Kelsall; T Marth
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.317

6.  Lymphocytes from orally tolerized mice display enhanced susceptibility to death by apoptosis when cultured in the absence of antigen in vitro.

Authors:  P Garside; M Steel; E A Worthey; P J Kewin; S E Howie; D J Harrison; D Bishop; A M Mowat
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 7.  A T cell/B cell/epithelial cell internet for mucosal inflammation and immunity.

Authors:  K Fujihashi; M N Kweon; H Kiyono; J L VanCott; F W van Ginkel; M Yamamoto; J R McGhee
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1997

8.  Mucosal tolerance is associated with, but independent of, up-regulation Th2 responses.

Authors:  D A Wolvers; M J van der Cammen; G Kraal
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Reversal of mucosal tolerance by subcutaneous administration of interleukin-12 at the site of attempted sensitization.

Authors:  A M Claessen; B M von Blomberg; J De Groot; D A Wolvers; G Kraal; R J Scheper
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Interferon-gamma receptor-deficient mice exhibit impaired gut mucosal immune responses but intact oral tolerance.

Authors:  M Kjerrulf; D Grdic; L Ekman; K Schön; M Vajdy; N Y Lycke
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.