Literature DB >> 7751495

Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data.

B M Ogles1, M J Lambert, J D Sawyer.   

Abstract

The clinical significance of research findings is an important issue that, until recently, was often neglected. Statistical methods are available, however, to evaluate the meaningfulness of pre- to post-treatment change. The clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program Data was evaluated. A substantial number of clients receiving treatment for depression made reliable improvements and had posttreatment scores that fell within a functional distribution. A small number of clients reliably deteriorated despite undergoing 12 sessions of treatment. No differences in clinical significance rates among treatment groups existed for measures of depressive symptoms. Treatments differed in terms of clinical significance on a measure of general symptom severity. There was substantial agreement among diverse methods of measurement regarding the identification of individuals making clinically significant change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751495     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.2.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  8 in total

1.  Measuring clinically meaningful change following mental health treatment.

Authors:  Susan V Eisen; Gayatri Ranganathan; Pradipta Seal; Avron Spiro
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Divergent Outcomes in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Adult Depression.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Vittengl; Robin B Jarrett; Erica Weitz; Steven D Hollon; Jos Twisk; Ioana Cristea; Daniel David; Robert J DeRubeis; Sona Dimidjian; Boadie W Dunlop; Mahbobeh Faramarzi; Ulrich Hegerl; Sidney H Kennedy; Farzan Kheirkhah; Roland Mergl; Jeanne Miranda; David C Mohr; A John Rush; Zindel V Segal; Juned Siddique; Anne D Simons; Pim Cuijpers
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Clinical significance and predictors of treatment response to cognitive-behavior therapy for insomnia secondary to chronic pain.

Authors:  Shawn R Currie; Keith G Wilson; Dorothyann Curran
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-04

4.  Is evidence-based treatment helping my patient? Utilizing modified Brinley plots to measure clinical change.

Authors:  Sarah R Black; Neville Blampied; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2018-12-28

5.  Statistical versus clinical significance for infants with brain injury: reanalysis of outcome data from a randomized controlled study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.075

Review 6.  Couple therapy for depression.

Authors:  Angelo Barbato; Barbara D'Avanzo; Alberto Parabiaghi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-08

7.  Cognitive-behavioural therapy does not meaningfully reduce depression in most people with epilepsy: a systematic review of clinically reliable improvement.

Authors:  Adam J Noble; James Reilly; James Temple; Peter L Fisher
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods.

Authors:  Fiona R Ronk; Geoffrey R Hooke; Andrew C Page
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.