Literature DB >> 7751115

Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants.

M Simion1, P Trisi, A Piattelli.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) the surgical protocol, effectiveness, and reliability for vertical ridge augmentation using a new titanium-reinforced membrane and osseointegrated implants; and (2) the histologic characteristics of the interface between a pure titanium implant and newly regenerated human bone. Five patients received 15 conical Brånemark-type implants in six different surgical sites requiring vertical augmentation. The implants protruded 4 to 7 mm from the bone crest. Pure titanium miniscrews (1.3 x 10 mm) were positioned distally to the implants, protruding 3 to 4 mm from the bone level. The implants and the miniscrews were covered with a titanium-reinforced membrane, and the flaps were sutured. Membranes were removed at the stage 2 surgery after 9 months of healing. Measurements of biopsy specimens showed a gain in bone height from 3 to 4 mm. Histologic examination showed that all retrieved miniscrews were in direct contact with bone. Histomorphometric analysis of bone contact gave a mean value of 42.5 +/- 3.6% for five of the six examined miniscrews. The results suggest that the placement of implants protruding 3 to 4 mm from the top of resorbed bone surfaces may result in vertical bone regeneration to the top of the implant cylinder and that the regenerated bone is able to osseointegrate pure titanium implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7751115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  The use of bovine screws to promote bone formation using a tibia model in dogs.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Bianchini; Marco Antônio B Pontual; Leonardo Bez; César Augusto M Benfatti; Fernanda Boabaid; Martha J Somerman; Ricardo S Magini
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-04-10

Review 2.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

3.  Horizontal bone augmentation using two membranes at dehisced implant sites: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Rakhshinda Nahid; Monika Bansal; Samidha Pandey
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  Histological examination of bone regeneration achieved by combining grafting with hydroxyapatite and thermoplastic bioresorbable plates.

Authors:  Taku Kojima; Norio Amizuka; Akiko Suzuki; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Michiko Yoshizawa; Akira Kudo; Chikara Saito; Takeyasu Maeda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Expression of growth factors during the healing process of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures using autogenous bone grafts in combination with GTR and an anorganic bovine bone substitute: an immunohistochemical study in the sheep.

Authors:  Steffen Koerdt; Oliver Ristow; Andreas Wannhoff; Alexander C Kübler; Tobias Reuther
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Clinical evaluation of ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth bone graft material: case series study.

Authors:  Ji-Young Lee; Young-Kyun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Joon-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-08-23

7.  Immunohistochemial study on the expression of von Willebrand factor (vWF) after onlay autogenous iliac grafts for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation.

Authors:  Steffen Koerdt; Joerg Siebers; Wilhelm Bloch; Oliver Ristow; Alexander C Kuebler; Tobias Reuther
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 8.  The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; George I Mataliotakis; Giorgio Maria Calori; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Surgical Approaches Based on Biological Objectives: GTR versus GBR Techniques.

Authors:  Gaia Pellegrini; Giorgio Pagni; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-06-13

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  B I Simon; A L Zatcoff; J J W Kong; S M O'Connell
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.