Literature DB >> 7750794

Ascorbic acid and cell survival of adriamycin resistant and sensitive MCF-7 breast tumor cells.

W W Wells1, P A Rocque, D P Xu, E B Meyer, L J Charamella, N V Dimitrov.   

Abstract

The ability of human cells to regenerate ascorbic acid from dehydroascorbate is partially dependent on the glutathione redox status of the cell and the relative activity of dehydroascorbate reductases. Mammalian dehydroascorbate reductase activity is associated with two proteins known as thioltransferase (glutaredoxin) and protein disulfide isomerase. We compared the specific activity of thioltransferase, protein disulfide isomerase, and other GSH-related enzymes in Adriamycin-resistant human breast tumor cells, MCF-7 ADRR, and Adriamycin-sensitive, MCF-7 WT, tumor cells. MCF-7 ADRR cells had higher activities of glutathione peroxidase (34.7 fold), nonseleno-glutathione peroxidase (glutathione S-transferases; 5.3 fold), thioredoxin (2.3 fold), and thioltransferase (4.0 fold) compared with the WT Adriamycin-sensitive cell line. Thioltransferase was detected in Western blots in extracts of ADRR MCF-7 cells but not in WT MCF-7 cells. alpha-Tocopherol in the membrane and cytosolic fractions was 2.8 and 3.0 fold higher, respectively, in Adriamycin-resistant compared with Adriamycin-sensitive cells. Supplementation of MCF-7 cells with L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (2 and 10 mM) had no effect on WT cell viability after 5 days incubation with up to 0.33 microM Adriamycin. In contrast, supplementation of ADRR MCF-7 cells with L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate resulted in enhanced resistance up to 3.4 microM Adriamycin over a 5-day incubation. Both lines of MCF-7 cells demonstrated the ability to utilize ascorbic acid as the 2-phosphate derivative. After 48 h incubation with 8.6 microM Adriamycin, the resistant cells maintained normal viability and ascorbate-dehydroascorbate levels, whereas drug-sensitive cells had significantly lower ascorbate with a higher percent dehydroascorbate and increased cell death as judged by cell protein levels (52% of controls).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7750794     DOI: 10.1016/0891-5849(94)00188-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  8 in total

Review 1.  Redox-directed cancer therapeutics: molecular mechanisms and opportunities.

Authors:  Georg T Wondrak
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Ascorbic acid is essential for the release of insulin from scorbutic guinea pig pancreatic islets.

Authors:  W W Wells; C Z Dou; L N Dybas; C H Jung; H L Kalbach; D P Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  alpha-Lipoic acid dependent regeneration of ascorbic acid from dehydroascorbic acid in rat liver mitochondria.

Authors:  D P Xu; W W Wells
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 4.  Mechanistic and kinetic details of catalysis of thiol-disulfide exchange by glutaredoxins and potential mechanisms of regulation.

Authors:  Molly M Gallogly; David W Starke; John J Mieyal
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of reversible protein S-glutathionylation.

Authors:  John J Mieyal; Molly M Gallogly; Suparna Qanungo; Elizabeth A Sabens; Melissa D Shelton
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Homologous expression of cytosolic dehydroascorbate reductase increases grain yield and biomass under paddy field conditions in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica).

Authors:  Young-Saeng Kim; Il-Sup Kim; Mi-Jung Bae; Yong-Hoe Choe; Yul-Ho Kim; Hyang-Mi Park; Hong-Gyu Kang; Ho-Sung Yoon
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 7.  Redox Regulation in Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Shijie Ding; Chunbao Li; Ninghui Cheng; Xiaojiang Cui; Xinglian Xu; Guanghong Zhou
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 8.  Potential Mechanisms of Action for Vitamin C in Cancer: Reviewing the Evidence.

Authors:  Margreet C M Vissers; Andrew B Das
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.