Literature DB >> 7748389

The effect of simulating on standardized patients.

C A Woodward1, G Gliva-McConvey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the growing use of standardized patients (SPs) in medical teaching and evaluation, a new occupation has emerged-that of SP.
METHOD: The effect of simulating was discussed in five focus groups with randomly chosen SPs from the SP program at the McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences in 1993. Meeting transcripts were content analyzed and reviewed by the SPs to ensure that the data were trustworthy.
RESULTS: Of the SPs invited to attend a focus group, 37 of 59 (63%) attended. The SPs stated that their role is complex and requires improvising while simultaneously monitoring the learner's performance to later provide detailed feedback. The SPs reported that they developed a more balanced view of health professionals, developed better communication skills, and became more tolerant of others. The role allowed them to explore how they reacted in novel situations, which enabled them to learn more about themselves.
CONCLUSION: The SPs described numerous effects of the SP role on their lives. Greater attention should be paid to how SPs are selected and debriefed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7748389     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199505000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patient methodology to assess healthcare communication.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather L Rogers; Allison C Waller; Sonja Harris-Haywood; Ronald M Esptein; Francesc Borrell Carrio; Gayle Gliva-McConvey; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-03

3.  Ethical participation of children and youth in medical education.

Authors:  Ri Hilliard; Cv Fernandez; E Tsai
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  Diversity and inclusion in simulation: addressing ethical and psychological safety concerns when working with simulated participants.

Authors:  Leanne Picketts; Marika Dawn Warren; Carrie Bohnert
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2021-05-06

5.  Using standardized patients to evaluate hospital-based intervention outcomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Chunqing Lin; Jihui Guan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Effect of emotionally complex roles on HIV-related simulated patients.

Authors:  Ximena Triviño; Lilian Ferrer; Margarita Bernales; Rosina Cianelli; Philippa Moore; Nilda Peragallo
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2013

7.  Working as simulated patient has effects on real patient life - Preliminary insights from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Simmenroth-Nayda; Gabriella Marx; Thorsten Lorkowski; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-17

8.  Transforming the Patient Role to Achieve Better Outcomes Through a Patient Empowerment Program: A Randomized Wait-List Control Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Altshuler; Joseph Plaksin; Sondra Zabar; Andrew Wallach; Chester Sawicki; Sarita Kundrod; Adina Kalet
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 9.  Simulation Training in Psychiatry for Medical Education: A Review.

Authors:  Marie-Aude Piot; Chris Attoe; Gregoire Billon; Sean Cross; Jan-Joost Rethans; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.157

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.