Literature DB >> 7747831

Short-stay carotid endarterectomy is safe and cost-effective.

L W Kraiss1, L Kilberg, S Critch, K J Johansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conventionally performed following a contrast arteriogram, under general anesthesia, and with postoperative admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated whether any of these traditional adjuncts to CEA is necessary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients had CEA performed according to a protocol of duplex scanning only, operation under regional anesthesia, and admission to the ICU only in cases of a proven need for services unique to the ICU (group I). Utilization of preoperative arteriography, admission to the ICU, postoperative complications, total hospital length of stay, and hospital charges were calculated for this group and results were compared with a group of 178 patients undergoing conventional CEA (arteriography, general anesthesia, routine ICU admission) during the same period (group II).
RESULTS: In group I, 1 patient (6%) underwent preoperative arteriography and 4 patients (22%) were admitted to the ICU after CEA. Most group II patients (114 of 178, or 64%) underwent preoperative arteriography and virtually all (175 of 178, or 98%) were admitted to the ICU. Compared with group II, the average hospital length of stay for group I was significantly shorter (1.3 +/- 0.1 versus 3.1 +/- 0.3 days, P = 0.03) and hospital charges were significantly reduced ($5,861 +/- 229 versus $11,140 +/- 729, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that CEA can be safely performed without routine preoperative carotid arteriography; that routine ICU admission is unnecessary for the majority of cases; and that elimination of routine arteriography and ICU admission can reduce hospital charges for CEA by nearly one half.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7747831     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80207-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Use of Intensive Care Services for Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Major Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Hayley B Gershengorn; Colin R Cooke; Carmen Guerra; Derek C Angus; John W Rowe; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Association between age and use of intensive care among surgical Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Hayley B Gershengorn; Carmen Guerra; John Rowe; Guohua Li
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Is there a Starling curve for intensive care?

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Use of intensive care unit priority model in directing intensive care unit admission in Sudan: A prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ihab B Abdalrahman; Shaima N Elgenaid; Mohammed Alhadi Babiker Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2021-03-27

5.  Novel Score for Stratifying Risk of Critical Care Needs in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Roland Faigle; Bridget J Chen; Rachel Krieger; Elisabeth B Marsh; Ayham Alkhachroum; Wei Xiong; Victor C Urrutia; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 11.800

6.  Patient Admission Preferences and Perceptions.

Authors:  Clayton Wu; Joy Melnikow; Tu Dinh; James F Holmes; Samuel D Gaona; Thomas Bottyan; Debora Paterniti; Daniel K Nishijima
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.