Literature DB >> 7746366

Event-related potentials in cross-modal divided attention in autism.

K T Ciesielski1, J E Knight, R J Prince, R J Harris, S D Handmaker.   

Abstract

The behavior and event-related potentials (ERPs) of high functioning subjects with autism (Autism group) were contrasted with the results of normal controls (Control group) during a focused visual attention, a focused auditory attention and a visual/auditory divided attention task. Detecting targets by the Autism group in the cross-modal divided attention condition was more difficult (longer RTs, lower % of correct detections) than attending to one modality. However, both the Autism and Control groups performed all tasks above chance level. The slow negative wave (SNW) was the only negative component which reflected Focused vs Divided task effect in Controls, being largest to stimuli in single channel-focused attention, intermediate when attention was divided between targets of two modalities and smallest to unattended stimuli. Task effects were more evident in the positive peaks for the Autism group. No significant divided attention task effect was noted for P3b, although it was larger for attended than ignored stimuli, of normal morphology and only slightly decreased in size in the Autism group as compared to the Control group. The failure of the Autism group to modulate the slow negative wave in response to Focused/Divided/Ignored conditions in a normal manner, the presence of relatively normal morphology despite the reduced amplitude of the P3b and other positive components, together with the high level of correct target detections are discussed in the context of a selective inhibition deficit and an alternative mechanism of selective attention in autism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7746366     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00094-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  22 in total

Review 1.  The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders.

Authors:  P A Filipek; P J Accardo; G T Baranek; E H Cook; G Dawson; B Gordon; J S Gravel; C P Johnson; R J Kallen; S E Levy; N J Minshew; S Ozonoff; B M Prizant; I Rapin; S J Rogers; W L Stone; S Teplin; R F Tuchman; F R Volkmar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  ERPs and eye movements reflect atypical visual perception in pervasive developmental disorder.

Authors:  Chantal Kemner; Herman van Engeland
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-01

3.  Abnormal selective attention normalizes P3 amplitudes in PDD.

Authors:  Marco R Hoeksma; Chantal Kemner; J Leon Kenemans; Herman van Engeland
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-07

Review 4.  Sensory integration and the perceptual experience of persons with autism.

Authors:  Grace Iarocci; John McDonald
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-01

Review 5.  Assessing behavioural and cognitive domains of autism spectrum disorders in rodents: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Martien J Kas; Jeffrey C Glennon; Jan Buitelaar; Elodie Ey; Barbara Biemans; Jacqueline Crawley; Robert H Ring; Clara Lajonchere; Frederic Esclassan; John Talpos; Lucas P J J Noldus; J Peter H Burbach; Thomas Steckler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The effect of visual perceptual load on auditory awareness in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Julian Tillmann; Andrea Olguin; Jyrki Tuomainen; John Swettenham
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-10

Review 7.  Sensory processing in autism: a review of neurophysiologic findings.

Authors:  Elysa J Marco; Leighton B N Hinkley; Susanna S Hill; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Susceptibility to distraction in autism spectrum disorder: probing the integrity of oscillatory alpha-band suppression mechanisms.

Authors:  Jeremy W Murphy; John J Foxe; Joanna B Peters; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.216

9.  Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) affects event-related potential measures of novelty processing in autism.

Authors:  Estate Sokhadze; Joshua Baruth; Allan Tasman; Mehreen Mansoor; Rajesh Ramaswamy; Lonnie Sears; Grace Mathai; Ayman El-Baz; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2010-06

Review 10.  Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism.

Authors:  Brandon Keehn; Ralph-Axel Müller; Jeanne Townsend
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.