Literature DB >> 7744898

Patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular injection of analgesics for the management of pain after an orthopaedic procedure.

C W Colwell1, B A Morris.   

Abstract

Patients who were scheduled for an elective joint replacement or spinal procedure were randomly assigned prospectively to one of two groups for the management of postoperative pain: ninety-one patients (Group I) controlled the administration of a narcotic analgesic themselves and ninety-three patients (Group II) received intramuscular injections of a narcotic analgesic, as needed. The patients who controlled the analgesic used a smaller amount of the analgesic on the first postoperative day, but the over-all amount was not significantly different between the two groups. The group that received intramuscular injections reported less pain overall, according to one of three pain-assessment scales, and had more relief of pain over-all and on the first postoperative day, according to another scale. The patients who had had a total joint replacement and who controlled the analgesia walked farther on the first postoperative day than those who received intramuscular injections. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the rate of complications, the arterial oxygen saturation levels during the first twenty-four hours after the operation, or the length of stay in the hospital. The nursing staff preferred the patient-administered method of analgesia, as it necessitated equal or less nursing time to assemble, initiate, and maintain than traditional intramuscular injections. The average cost per patient was $58.58 for the patient-administered analgesia and $22.45 for the intramuscular injections.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7744898     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199505000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy.

Authors:  R N Upton; T J Semple; P E Macintyre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Cost considerations in patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  A Jacox; D B Carr; D M Mahrenholz; B M Ferrell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Comparison of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and routine care with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the management of early postoperative mobilisation: results from a randomised study.

Authors:  Richard M Langford; Kuang-Yi Chang; Li Ding; Jeffrey Abraham
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 4.  The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Authors:  Justin Upp; Michael Kent; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 5.  The influence of anesthesia and pain management on cognitive dysfunction after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Atul Prabhu; Anthony V Perruccio; Rajiv Gandhi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Pain management in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a review.

Authors:  U Mathuram Thiyagarajan; A Bagul; M L Nicholson
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-23

7.  Analgesia following major gynecological laparoscopic surgery--PCA versus intermittent intramuscular injection.

Authors:  D M Rosen; A M Lam; M A Carlton; G M Cario; L McBride
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.