Literature DB >> 7744433

Variations in bone regeneration adjacent to implants augmented with barrier membranes alone or with demineralized freeze-dried bone or autologous grafts: a study in dogs.

W Becker1, R Schenk, K Higuchi, U Lekholm, B E Becker.   

Abstract

A study was performed in two large hound dogs to evaluate the bone-induction potential of demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA) placed into defects adjacent to implants that were placed into extraction sockets. Two implants were untreated controls, two implants received only Gore-Tex Augmentation Membrane (GTAM), two implants received GTAM and autologous bone, and six sites received GTAM and DFDBA. DFDBA was prepared from the long bones of a dog of the same breed as the experimental dogs. P2, P3, and P4 were extracted bilaterally, and buccal defects were created and measured. Twelve commercially pure titanium Brånemark implants were placed. At 12 weeks, clinical measurements were taken and the dogs were sacrificed. The untreated control defects had a mean clinical bone fill of 1.75 mm (37%). Sites treated with autologous bone had a mean of 5.0 mm (95%) of clinical bone fill within the original defects. Sites treated with DFDBA and barriers had 3.8 mm (75%) of bone fill, while sites treated with membranes alone had a mean of 4.2 mm (80%) of bone fill. Histologic evaluation revealed that DFDBA sites had retained nonviable bone chips in 45.4% of the bone matrix, and only 8.3% was lamellar bone. Autologous graft sites had 26.2% retained bone chips within the bone matrix, and 61% percent of the matrix consisted of lamellar bone. For GTAM-only sites, 70.2% of the matrix was lamellar bone and 29.8% was woven bone. Retained DFDBA bone chips were nonviable, occasionally surrounded by woven bone, and appeared to break up and then remineralize without the presence of osteoclastic or osteoblastic activity. Retained autologous bone chips were surrounded and incorporated by the host bone. The autologous bone grafts and DFDBA implants were considered to be osteoconductive. For the three treatment groups, within the defects there were sparse bone-implant contacts. The results indicate that GTAM barriers alone or with autologous bone grafts produced the best clinical and histologic results. DFDBA did not appear to induce bone formation in any of the evaluated specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7744433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  9 in total

1.  The use of fresh-frozen bone in oral surgery: a clinical study of 14 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Chiara D'Aloja; Ernesto D'Aloja; Enrico Santi; Massimo Franchini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  In vitro comparison of the efficacy of TGF-β1 and PDGF-BB in combination with freeze-dried bone allografts for induction of osteogenic differentiation in MG-63 osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Surena Vahabi; Maryam Torshabi; Azadeh Esmaeil Nejad
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Performance of coralline hydroxyapatite in sinus floor augmentation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhi-Bin Luo; Qing-Bin Zhang; Zhao-Qiang Zhang; Dan Chen; Wang-Xiang Yan; Ke-Feng Li; Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Bone regeneration in aesthetic areas using titanium micromesh. Three case reports.

Authors:  A Scarano; B Assenza; A DI Cerbo; V Candotto; P Santos DE Oliveira; F Lorusso
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

5.  A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs.

Authors:  Ahmad Moghareh Abed; Rasool Heidari Pestekan; Jaber Yaghini; Seyed Mohammad Razavi; Mohammad Tavakoli; Mohammad Amjadi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011

6.  In vitro assay for osteoinductive activity of different demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.

Authors:  Shahram Vaziri; Surena Vahabi; Maryam Torshabi; Somayeh Hematzadeh
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery.

Authors:  Megumi Takamoto; Masaaki Takechi; Kouji Ohta; Yoshiaki Ninomiya; Shigehiro Ono; Hideo Shigeishi; Misato Tada; Nobuyuki Kamata
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Biomaterials in maxillofacial surgery: membranes and grafts.

Authors:  Luigi F Rodella; Gaia Favero; Mauro Labanca
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-06

9.  Efficacy of Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) and Highly Purified Bovine Xenograft (Laddec(®)) Combination in Bone Regeneration after Cyst Enucleation: Radiological and Histological Evaluation.

Authors:  Sabrina Pappalardo; Renzo Guarnieri
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-10-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.