Literature DB >> 7743792

Medical applications of scleral contact lenses: 1. A retrospective analysis of 343 cases.

D T Tan1, K W Pullum, R J Buckley.   

Abstract

The medical indications for, and outcome of scleral contact lens wear in 517 eyes of 343 patients attending a Scleral Contact Lens Clinic during a 5-year period from July 1988 to June 1993 were analysed. Keratoconus was the most common condition requiring scleral lens wear (36.2%), followed by aphakia (18.4%), postpenetrating keratoplasty (12.0%), irregular astigmatism secondary to corneal disease (12.0%), high myopia (12.8%), and ocular surface disorders (6.4%). The main indication was visual (85.8%), whereas therapeutic indications accounted for 8.2% of cases. Seventy-six percent of cases had previously failed with other types of contact lenses. The majority of patients were initially fitted with impression moulded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses (90.5%); other scleral lens types included preformed PMMA lenses, preformed high Dk gas-permeable (GP) lenses, and a GP/PMMA hybrid scleral lens design. Initial scleral lens fitting was successful in 93.2% of cases, and 71% remained successful with a mean duration of 11.8 years' follow-up. Complications included corneal vascularisation (13.3% of eyes), episodes of corneal oedema (7.4%), corneal abrasion (3.1%), and giant papillary conjunctivitis (1.7%). In addition to 19 eyes initially fitted with GP lenses, there were 99 eyes initially wearing PMMA lenses that were subsequently refitted with GP scleral lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7743792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

1.  Scleral contact lenses are not optically inferior to corneal lenses.

Authors:  A Salam; B Melia; A J Singh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  [Gas permeable scleral lenses as a conservative treatment option for extreme corneal ectasias and severe dry eye].

Authors:  K T Hänisch; B Neppert; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Boston ocular surface prosthesis: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Varsha Madanlal Rathi; Preeji Sudharman Mandathara; Srikanth Dumpati; Pravin K Vaddavalli; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 4.  Contact Lens-related Complications: A Review.

Authors:  Fateme Alipour; Saeed Khaheshi; Mahya Soleimanzadeh; Somayeh Heidarzadeh; Sepideh Heydarzadeh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.