Literature DB >> 7743787

A randomized trial to assess effectiveness and cost in clinical practice: rationale and design of the Cholesterol Reduction Intervention Study (CRIS).

G Oster1, G M Borok, J Menzin, J F Heys, R S Epstein, V Quinn, V V Benson, R J Dudl, A Epstein.   

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness and costs of two alternative approaches to the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, a prospective randomized trial is being undertaken at Southern California Kaiser Permanente, a large health maintenance organization. Six hundred and twelve patients with postdiet LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in the range of 190-230 mg/dl (or 160-230 mg/dl for those with coronary heart disease or two or more coronary risk factors) were randomized to a stepped-care regimen (initial treatment with niacin followed by other agents if needed) or to initial use of lovastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. All patients are being followed for 1 year. The study seeks to approximate conditions of typical clinical practice: provider compliance with these plans of treatment is encouraged but not enforced and patients pay for medication as they customarily would. Principal outcomes of interest include the proportion of participants who achieve goal LDL-C at one year, the mean change in total cholesterol and LDL-C levels between baseline and the end of follow-up, and the costs of cholesterol-lowering therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7743787     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00028-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  7 in total

1.  Individualized stepped care of chronic illness.

Authors:  M Von Korff; B Tiemens
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world. Effectiveness versus efficacy studies.

Authors:  D A Revicki; L Frank
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The problem of protocol driven costs in pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  D Coyle; K M Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A reappraisal of economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Science or marketing?

Authors:  M F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Niacin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Stefan Schandelmaier; Matthias Briel; Ramon Saccilotto; Kelechi K Olu; Armon Arpagaus; Lars G Hemkens; Alain J Nordmann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-14

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of cholesterol-related interventions in general practice. An appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  T van der Weijden; J A Knottnerus; A J Ament; H E Stoffers; R P Grol
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for statin therapies in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Italy.

Authors:  P Berto; V Munro; A Gaddi; C Negrini; J Hutton; O Mast
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.