Literature DB >> 7743747

Bone mineral density of the spine and the hip measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: normal range and fracture threshold for western European (Belgian) postmenopausal females.

J Y Reginster1, C Janssen, R Deroisy, B Zegels, A Albert, P Franchimont.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the different regions of interest (ROI) of the hip were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 278 healthy Belgian postmenopausal women and 93 postmenopausal type I osteoporotic females in order to: a) determine the normal range for lumbar and hip BMD values; b) define an "hypothetical" fracture threshold in this population; c) determine the preferential region to be considered for clinical use in type I osteoporosis. In the normal subjects, there is a negative relationship (< 0.001) between age or time elapsed since menopause (Tm) and BMD measured at the level of the spine or at the ROI of the hip. For the spine, evidence of a curvilinear relationship was assessed. Regressions of BMD at the hip as a function of age or time elapsed since menopause, were best fitted by a linear relationship. In the population of postmenopausal women who have experienced a vertebral crush fracture, no relationships were observed between spine BMD and age or Tm but the osteoporotic women had a spine BMD significantly lower compared to age-matched normal controls: Z-score = -1.2 +/- 0.6 (mean +/- SD) (p < 0.0001). Fracture threshold calculated as the 90th percentile of spine BMD measured in osteoporotic patients was 0.840 g/cm2, corresponding to the mean value -1 SD for a population of women aged 51 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7743747     DOI: 10.1007/BF02208087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  35 in total

1.  Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; R M Neer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Bone mineral density in Australia compared with the United States.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; R B Mazess; P N Sambrook; M G Yeates; J Freund
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Relative contributions of aging and estrogen deficiency to postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  L S Richelson; H W Wahner; L J Melton; B L Riggs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  [Measurement of lumbar bone mineral density by biphoton absorptiometry. Methodology. Reproductibility. Normal values].

Authors:  P Braillon; F Duboeuf; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1987-11

6.  The range of bone density in normal British women.

Authors:  M L Hall; J Heavens; I D Cullum; P J Ell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Dual photon absorptiometry of the spine with a low activity source of gadolinium 153.

Authors:  P Tothill; M A Smith; D Sutton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl; B G Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; M Griffin; A Chines; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone mineral density in Chinese elderly women with hip fracture.

Authors:  R S Yang; T K Liu; F J Dorey; P U Chieng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Normative data of bone Mineral Density in healthy population of Tehran, Iran: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Bagher Larijani; Arash Hossein-Nezhad; Alireza Mojtahedi; Mohammad Pajouhi; Mohammad H Bastanhagh; Akbar Soltani; Seyed-Zahra Mirfezi; Roya Dashti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Gut microbiota is associated with bone mineral density : an observational and genome-wide environmental interaction analysis in the UK Biobank cohort.

Authors:  Bolun Cheng; Yan Wen; Xuena Yang; Shiqiang Cheng; Li Liu; Xiaomeng Chu; Jing Ye; Chujun Liang; Yao Yao; Yumeng Jia; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.