Literature DB >> 7743483

A phase II evaluation of thiotepa followed by other multiagent chemotherapy regimens in infants and young children with malignant brain tumors.

B I Razzouk1, R L Heideman, H S Friedman, J J Jenkins, L E Kun, D L Fairclough, M E Horowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy may be used to delay the need for cranial irradiation in infants and young children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The polyfunctional alkylator thiotepa (TT) possesses significant in vitro and in vivo activity in many central nervous system tumors. Before the introduction of a multiagent chemotherapy previously shown to be active in such tumors, thiotepa alone was evaluated in an upfront therapeutic window.
METHODS: Twenty young children with CNS tumors (19 newly diagnosed, 1 recurrent) were treated with two cycles of TT before response evaluation. Patients on thiotepa without disease progression went on to receive further chemotherapy consisting of alternating cycles of cyclophosphamide plus vincristine, cisplatin plus etoposide, and further TT. Patients with disease progression received radiation therapy.
RESULTS: Low objective rates of response and poor survival led to early study termination. Of 17 patients evaluable for response, 6 (35%) demonstrated disease progression during initial TT therapy. Only two objective responses were noted, both in patients with medulloblastoma. Among the 19 patients evaluable for survival, the overall and progression free survivals were 45% and 20%, respectively, at 3 years postdiagnosis. Myelosuppression was the dominant treatment-related toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers of patients were small, thiotepa as used in this study was associated with a poor objective response rate and an unacceptably high rate of disease progression. These results may be partly related to TT's significant myelosuppressive effects and the postponement of more effective chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7743483     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950601)75:11<2762::aid-cncr2820751121>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  Salvage chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent ependymoma of childhood.

Authors:  Eric Bouffet; Michael Capra; Ute Bartels
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Chemotherapy drug thioTEPA exacerbates stress-induced anhedonia and corticosteroid responses but not impairment of hippocampal cell proliferation in adult mice.

Authors:  Courtney L Wilson; E Todd Weber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Pharmacotherapy of malignant astrocytomas of children and adults: current strategies and future trends.

Authors:  M T Jennings; S Iyengar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  M1 Medulloblastoma: high risk at any age.

Authors:  Robert P Sanders; Arzu Onar; James M Boyett; Alberto Broniscer; E Brannon Morris; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Gregory T Armstrong; Frederick A Boop; Robert A Sanford; Larry E Kun; Thomas E Merchant; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Childhood ependymoma: a systematic review of treatment options and strategies.

Authors:  Jacques Grill; Chastagner Pascal; Kalifa Chantal
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Neurotoxicity of chemotherapeutic and biologic agents in children with cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C De Braganca; Roger J Packer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.081

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.