J L Susman1, B F Crabtree, G Essink. 1. Department of Family Practice, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore rural family physicians' decision-making processes when they encounter depression. DESIGN: Exploratory qualitative "field study" using individual in-depth interviews and participant observation. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed by an editing approach. SETTING: Rural Nebraska family physicians' offices. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of six rural Nebraska family physicians, including five men and one woman, aged 35 to 65 years; two in solo practice, three in two-person practices, and one in a group practice; in communities with populations ranging from 600 to 6500. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes common to all interviews. RESULTS: Themes included the following: depression is easy to recognize but difficult to diagnose; depression is readily treatable but requires negotiation to manage; and depression is important but time and resources are limited. The inadequate diagnosis and treatment of depression appeared to be partly artifactual and must be understood against a background of perceived stigma, high prevalence of depressive symptoms, structural barriers to care, and context of rural practice. CONCLUSIONS: Rural family physicians may have a more deliberate, organized, and rational approach to depressive disorders than previously reported. Depression is commonly recognized by rural family physicians; however, they hesitate to diagnose this condition because of diagnostic uncertainty, perceived stigma, the desire to preserve the physician-patient relationship, time and financial pressures, and a lack of supporting resources.
OBJECTIVE: To explore rural family physicians' decision-making processes when they encounter depression. DESIGN: Exploratory qualitative "field study" using individual in-depth interviews and participant observation. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed by an editing approach. SETTING: Rural Nebraska family physicians' offices. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of six rural Nebraska family physicians, including five men and one woman, aged 35 to 65 years; two in solo practice, three in two-person practices, and one in a group practice; in communities with populations ranging from 600 to 6500. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes common to all interviews. RESULTS: Themes included the following: depression is easy to recognize but difficult to diagnose; depression is readily treatable but requires negotiation to manage; and depression is important but time and resources are limited. The inadequate diagnosis and treatment of depression appeared to be partly artifactual and must be understood against a background of perceived stigma, high prevalence of depressive symptoms, structural barriers to care, and context of rural practice. CONCLUSIONS: Rural family physicians may have a more deliberate, organized, and rational approach to depressive disorders than previously reported. Depression is commonly recognized by rural family physicians; however, they hesitate to diagnose this condition because of diagnostic uncertainty, perceived stigma, the desire to preserve the physician-patient relationship, time and financial pressures, and a lack of supporting resources.
Authors: Chizobam Ani; Mohsen Bazargan; David Hindman; Douglas Bell; Michael Rodriguez; Richard S Baker Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: John W Beasley; Terry H Hankey; Rodney Erickson; Kurt C Stange; Marlon Mundt; Marguerite Elliott; Pamela Wiesen; James Bobula Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Reuben R McDaniel; Kurt C Stange; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth Stewart Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Alison Karasz; Christopher Dowrick; Richard Byng; Marta Buszewicz; Lucia Ferri; Tim C Olde Hartman; Sandra van Dulmen; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Joanne Reeve Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Robert D Keeley; Jeffrey L Smith; Paul A Nutting; L Miriam Dickinson; W Perry Dickinson; Kathryn M Rost Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.128