Literature DB >> 7742518

Minimal access surgery in gynecologic cancer: we can, but should we?

J M Childers1, A Nasseri.   

Abstract

Operative laparoscopists continue to refine surgical techniques applicable to patients with gynecologic malignancies. Various techniques for radical hysterectomy and larger series of patients with endometrial cancer have now been reported. The technical feasibility of such operations is being established. Although oncologic patients may enjoy the known benefits of laparoscopic surgery, such as shorter hospitalization, the known shortcomings, such as longer operative times and increased cost, are a concern. The unknown shortcomings and the unknown overall survival of laparoscopically managed patients continue to keep the majority of oncologic surgeons a safe distance away.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7742518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses.

Authors:  E Serur; P L Emeney; D W Byrne
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ali Kucukmetin; Ioannis Biliatis; Raj Naik; Andrew Bryant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.