Literature DB >> 7741666

The distribution of hearing threshold levels in the general population aged 18-30 years.

M E Lutman1, A C Davis.   

Abstract

Hearing threshold levels at audiometric frequencies between 0.25 and 8 kHz were obtained by manual audiometry using 5-dB steps in adults aged 18-30 years, as part of a large random survey of hearing in the UK. After screening to ensure otological normality, including careful analysis of any noise exposure history, the median thresholds of the 241 screened subjects deviated from audiometric zero by an average of 4.3 dB over the frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz in the direction of poorer hearing. Even greater deviations were evident at 0.25, 6 and 8 kHz, consistent with the discrepancies between normal hearing threshold and ISO 389 standard reference zero that have been reported previously. Within the age band from 18 to 30 years, age did not influence hearing threshold levels. Socio-economic status defined by occupational group (manual or non-manual) had a significant effect at frequencies up to 2 kHz, with those in non-manual occupations having better hearing than those in manual occupations by an average of 2.4 dB, despite screening for middle-ear disease, noise exposure and other possibly confounding factors. In a screened sample, males had better hearing threshold levels than females, but this difference was sensitive to screening criteria. The unscreened sample had median hearing threshold levels that were at most 2 dB worse than the screened sample across the frequency range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7741666     DOI: 10.3109/00206099409071891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  10 in total

1.  Absence of cochleotoxicity measured by standard and high-frequency pure tone audiometry in a trial of once- versus three-times-daily tobramycin in cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Michael Mulheran; Pauline Hyman-Taylor; Kelvin H-V Tan; Sarah Lewis; David Stableforth; Alan Knox; Alan Smyth
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Occurrence and risk of cochleotoxicity in cystic fibrosis patients receiving repeated high-dose aminoglycoside therapy.

Authors:  M Mulheran; C Degg; S Burr; D W Morgan; D E Stableforth
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Guidelines for Diagnosing and Quantifying Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; David A Lowe; Graham Cox
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

4.  Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras.

Authors:  E J M Jansen; H W Helleman; W A Dreschler; J A P M de Laat
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry.

Authors:  Marcin Masalski; Tomasz Grysiński; Tomasz Kręcicki
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Hearing in Adults: A Digital Reprint of the Main Report From the MRC National Study of Hearing.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; George G Browning; Adrian C Davis; Mark P Haggard
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Biological calibration for web-based hearing tests: evaluation of the methods.

Authors:  Marcin Masalski; Tomasz Grysiński; Tomasz Kręcicki
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Hearing in middle age: a population snapshot of 40- to 69-year olds in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Heather Fortnum; David R Moore; Richard Emsley; Paul Norman; Karen Cruickshanks; Adrian Davis; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Abby McCormack; Mark Lutman; Kevin Munro
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Occupational noise, smoking, and a high body mass index are risk factors for age-related hearing impairment and moderate alcohol consumption is protective: a European population-based multicenter study.

Authors:  Erik Fransen; Vedat Topsakal; Jan-Jaap Hendrickx; Lut Van Laer; Jeroen R Huyghe; Els Van Eyken; Nele Lemkens; Samuli Hannula; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Mona Jensen; Kelly Demeester; Anke Tropitzsch; Amanda Bonaconsa; Manuela Mazzoli; Angeles Espeso; Katia Verbruggen; Joke Huyghe; Patrick L M Huygen; Sylvia Kunst; Minna Manninen; Amalia Diaz-Lacava; Michael Steffens; Thomas F Wienker; Ilmari Pyykkö; Cor W R J Cremers; Hannie Kremer; Ingeborg Dhooge; Dafydd Stephens; Eva Orzan; Markus Pfister; Michael Bille; Agnete Parving; Martti Sorri; Paul Van de Heyning; Guy Van Camp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-10

10.  Better Hearing in Norway: A Comparison of Two HUNT Cohorts 20 Years Apart.

Authors:  Bo Engdahl; Bjørn Heine Strand; Lisa Aarhus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.