Literature DB >> 7741127

The accuracy of death certificates in identifying work-related fatal injuries.

J F Kraus1, C Peek, T Silberman, C Anderson.   

Abstract

Three national US agencies report on work-related fatal injuries, and one uses the "injury at work" designation on the death certificate to identify and characterize these fatalities. The accuracy of the "injury at work" notation has not been validated. The authors used selected external causes of death (from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) that are highly likely to be work-related or not work-related as a standard to compare with the California death certificate "at work" designation for the years 1979-1989. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics for the years 1979-1984 were used to measure prevalence for purposes of determining the predictive value of a positive or negative work-related notation on the death certificate. The sensitivity of the "at work" designation was 77.6%, with a specificity of over 99%. Sensitivity but not specificity varied by age, sex, and specific external cause of death. The predictive value positive of the "at work" designation was about 60%, which suggests caution in using it for some epidemiologic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7741127     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Determining injury at work on the California death certificate.

Authors:  C Peek-Asa; D L McArthur; J F Kraus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Evaluation of death certificate-based surveillance for traumatic brain injury--Oklahoma 2002.

Authors:  Sara Russell Rodriguez; Sue Mallonee; Pam Archer; Jeffery Gofton
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  A comparison of two surveillance systems for deaths related to violent injury.

Authors:  R D Comstock; S Mallonee; F Jordan
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  The prevalence of work-related suicides varies by reporting source from the National Violent Death Reporting System.

Authors:  Corinne Peek-Asa; Ling Zhang; Cara Hamann; Jonathon Davis; Carri Casteel
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 5.  Toxicology testing in fatally injured workers: a review of five years of Iowa FACE cases.

Authors:  Marizen Ramirez; Ronald Bedford; Ryan Sullivan; T Renee Anthony; John Kraemer; Brett Faine; Corinne Peek-Asa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Characteristics and Circumstances Associated with Work-Related Suicides from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013-2017.

Authors:  Corinne Peek-Asa; Ling Zhang; Cara Hamann; Jonathan Davis; Laura Schwab-Reese
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.