Literature DB >> 7740125

Stimulus salience and negative patterning.

E S Redhead1, J M Pearce.   

Abstract

Rats in Experiment 1 received a negative patterning discrimination in which food was delivered after either of two auditory stimuli when they were presented individually, but not when they were presented in compound. The stimuli were of different intensity. The discrimination between the compound and the stimulus of lower intensity was acquired more readily than was the discrimination between the compound and the more intense stimulus. A similar pattern of results was found in the remaining two experiments, which also employed a negative patterning discrimination, but either with stimuli from different modalities (Experiment 2) or with pigeons rather than rats (Experiment 3). The results were predicted more readily by a configural than by an elemental theory of conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7740125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

2.  An attention-modulated associative network.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Permanent damage or temporary silencing of retrosplenial cortex impairs the expression of a negative patterning discrimination.

Authors:  Danielle I Fournier; Travis P Todd; David J Bucci
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 4.  On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Navarro; Ridhi Jani; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 6.  Retrosplenial cortex and its role in cue-specific learning and memory.

Authors:  Travis P Todd; Danielle I Fournier; David J Bucci
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  A modified version of the unique cue theory accounts for olfactory compound processing in honeybees.

Authors:  Nina Deisig; Harald Lachnit; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Klaus Lober; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  An elemental model of retrospective revaluation without within-compound associations.

Authors:  Patrick C Connor; Vincent M Lolordo; Thomas P Trappenberg
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.926

Review 9.  Accounting for individual differences in human associative learning.

Authors:  Nicola C Byrom
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-04

10.  Failures to replicate blocking are surprising and informative-Reply to Soto (2018).

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Yannick Boddez; Joaquín Matías Alfei Palloni; Rudi D'Hooge; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.