Literature DB >> 7738618

Elevated serum c-erbB-2 antigen levels and decreased response to hormone therapy of breast cancer.

K Leitzel1, Y Teramoto, K Konrad, V M Chinchilli, G Volas, H Grossberg, H Harvey, L Demers, A Lipton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Decisions concerning the use of hormone therapy to treat metastatic breast cancer are made on the basis of the presence of estrogen receptor (ER). Despite the presence of ER, half of patients will not respond to hormone treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of overexpression of HER-2/neu on the response to hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sera from 300 metastatic breast cancer patients with ER-positive (ER+), ER status unknown, or ER-/progesterone receptor-positive (PR+) randomized to receive second-line hormone therapy with either megestrol acetate or fadrozole were evaluated. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) specific for the extracellular domain of the c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) oncogene product was used to detect serum levels.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (19.3%) had elevated serum c-erbB-2 protein levels, using a selected cut-point of 30 U/mL. The response rate (complete responses [CRs] plus partial responses [PRs] plus stable disease [S]) to endocrine therapy was 40.9% in 242 patients with low serum c-erbB-2 levels and only 20.7% in 58 patients with elevated serum c-erbB-2 levels (P = .004). The median duration of treatment response was longer in the group with low serum c-erbB-2 levels (15.5 months) compared with the group with elevated serum c-erbB-2 levels (11.6 months). Survival was also significantly shorter in patients with elevated serum c-erbB-2 levels (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Patients with ER+/c-erbB-2+ metastatic breast cancer are less likely to respond to hormone treatment than ER+/c-erbB-2- patients. Their survival duration is also shorter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7738618     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

1.  Poor-prognosis estrogen receptor- positive disease: present and future clinical solutions.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 2.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Downregulation of ER-α36 expression sensitizes HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells to tamoxifen.

Authors:  Li Yin; Xiaohua Pan; Xin-Tian Zhang; Yu-Ming Guo; Zhao-Yi Wang; Yaoqin Gong; Molin Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  The development, application and limitations of breast cancer cell lines to study tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Cynthie Wong; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 5.  Extranuclear signaling by sex steroid receptors and clinical implications in breast cancer.

Authors:  Viroj Boonyaratanakornkit; Nalo Hamilton; Diana C Márquez-Garbán; Prangwan Pateetin; Eileen M McGowan; Richard J Pietras
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.102

6.  AKT-aro and HER2-aro, models for de novo resistance to aromatase inhibitors; molecular characterization and inhibitor response studies.

Authors:  Cynthie Wong; Xin Wang; David Smith; Kaladhar Reddy; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Tamoxifen resistance and Her2/neu expression in an aged, irradiated rat breast carcinoma model.

Authors:  Norman C Peterson; Matthew D Servinsky; Archie Christian; Zhongsheng Peng; Weiping Qiu; Jill Mann; John Dicello; David L Huso
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  New generation aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer. Weighing out potential costs and benefits.

Authors:  G M Higa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Effects of in vivo heregulin beta1 treatment in wild-type and ErbB gene-targeted mice depend on receptor levels and pregnancy.

Authors:  S O'Shea; K Johnson; R Clark; M X Sliwkowski; S L Erickson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  From HER2/Neu signal cascade to androgen receptor and its coactivators: a novel pathway by induction of androgen target genes through MAP kinase in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  S Yeh; H K Lin; H Y Kang; T H Thin; M F Lin; C Chang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.