Literature DB >> 7737922

Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.

R K Shepherd1, J Matsushima, R L Martin, G M Clark.   

Abstract

The present study examines the effects of long-term electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve on cochlear histopathology and spiral ganglion cell survival in young sensorineural deafened cats. Eight kittens were deafened using kanamycin and ethacrynic acid, and implanted with bipolar or monopolar scala tympani electrodes. Following recovery from surgery the animals were unilaterally stimulated using charge balanced biphasic current pulses for 450-1730 hours over implant periods of up to four months. Charge densities varied from 0.6-0.9 microC.cm-2 geom. per phase for monopolar electrodes to 12-26 microC.cm-2 geom. per phase for the bipolar electrodes. Electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were periodically monitored during stimulation to confirm that the stimulus levels were above threshold, and to monitor any change in the response of the auditory nerve. Following completion of the stimulation program cochleae were prepared for histological examination. EABRs exhibited relatively stable thresholds for both stimulated and implanted, unstimulated control cochleae for the stimulus duration. While the growth in response amplitude as a function of stimulus current remained stable for the bipolar control and monopolar stimulated cochleae, the five cochleae chronically stimulated using bipolar electrodes exhibited a moderate to large increase in response amplitude. These increases were associated with a more widespread fibrous tissue response which may have altered the current distribution within these cochleae. Implanted control cochleae exhibited significantly less tissue response within the scala tympani. Importantly, we observed no statistically significant difference in the spiral ganglion cell density associated with chronic electrical stimulation when compared with unstimulated control cochleae. While the present study supports the safe application of cochlear implants in young profoundly deafened children, it does not corroborate previous studies that have reported electrical stimulation providing a trophic effect on degenerating auditory nerve fibres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7737922     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90162-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  36 in total

1.  The effect of cochlear-implant-mediated electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cells in congenitally deaf white cats.

Authors:  Iris Chen; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-04

2.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparative analysis of combination kanamycin-furosemide versus kanamycin alone in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Keiko Hirose; Eisuke Sato
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The pattern and degree of capsular fibrous sheaths surrounding cochlear electrode arrays.

Authors:  Reuven Ishai; Barbara S Herrmann; Joseph B Nadol; Alicia M Quesnel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Combining cell-based therapies and neural prostheses to promote neural survival.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon; Alison J Neil; Lisa N Pettingill; Marilyn S Geaney; Stephen J Skinner; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 7.  Feline deafness.

Authors:  David K Ryugo; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.093

8.  Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons.

Authors:  Rachael T Richardson; Andrew K Wise; Brianna C Thompson; Brianna O Flynn; Patrick J Atkinson; Nicole J Fretwell; James B Fallon; Gordon G Wallace; Rob K Shepherd; Graeme M Clark; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Factors influencing neurotrophic effects of electrical stimulation in the deafened developing auditory system.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Olga Stakhovskaya; Gary T Hradek; Alexander M Hetherington
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.