Literature DB >> 7736742

Predictive ability of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring applied to human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients.

M C Brown1, W B Crede.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive ability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) prognostic scoring system when applied to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive patients in the medical intensive care unit (ICU).
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review.
SETTING: An urban university hospital serving the local community population and also functioning as a tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: All HIV-positive patients who were discharged from the Yale-New Haven Hospital medical ICU between October 1, 1986 and September 30, 1991.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: APACHE II scoring significantly underestimated the mortality rate in our patient population (n = 161) (35.5% estimated vs. 44.1% observed, p < .025). When patients were evaluated according to total lymphocyte count, APACHE II scores accurately predicted the mortality rate of all patients with a total lymphocyte count of > or = 201 cells/mm3 (n = 112) (32.6% estimated vs. 33.0% observed). However, APACHE II scoring significantly underestimated the mortality rate in the group of patients with a total lymphocyte count of < or = 200 cells/mm3 (n = 36) (44.2% expected vs. 61.1% observed, p < .05), particularly those patients with pneumonia or sepsis (n = 14) (50.5% expected vs. 85.7% observed, p < .01).
CONCLUSION: APACHE II scoring significantly underestimates mortality risk in HIV-positive patients admitted to the medical ICU with a total lymphocyte count of < or = 200 cells/mm3. This finding is particularly true regarding patients admitted due to pneumonia or sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7736742     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199505000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  5 in total

1.  Improved Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With AIDS: How Does This Trend Continue?

Authors:  Daniel A Sweeney; Kevan Akrami; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?

Authors:  T Berghmans; M Paesmans; J P Sculier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  When do confounding by indication and inadequate risk adjustment bias critical care studies? A simulation study.

Authors:  Michael W Sjoding; Kaiyi Luo; Melissa A Miller; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Delta neutrophil index is an independent predictor of mortality in septic acute kidney injury patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  In Mi Han; Chang-Yun Yoon; Dong Ho Shin; Youn Kyung Kee; Seung Gyu Han; Young Eun Kwon; Kyoung Sook Park; Mi Jung Lee; Hyung Jung Oh; Jung Tak Park; Seung Hyeok Han; Shin-Wook Kang; Tae-Hyun Yoo
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in predicting hospital mortality of neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Sang-Kyu Park; Hyoung-Joon Chun; Dong-Won Kim; Tai-Ho Im; Hyun-Jong Hong; Hyeong-Joong Yi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.