Literature DB >> 7736333

Local anesthetic use by dentists in Ontario.

D A Haas1, D Lennon.   

Abstract

A mail survey to obtain data on the annual use of local anesthetics in dentistry was sent to each of the 6,271 certified dentists in Ontario in 1993. The survey asked dentists to identify the different types and total amounts of local anesthetics used in their practice yearly. A total of 2,426 dentists responded to the survey. Based on extrapolation of the data collected, it is estimated that more than 11,000,000 cartridges of local anesthetic are administered annually by dentists in Ontario. The distribution of use of specific types of local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors was also determined. Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine accounted for 23.4 per cent of all cartridges used, followed by articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (19.9 per cent), articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (17.9 per cent), prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (16.4 per cent), mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin (6.4 per cent), and mepivacaine plain (6.3 per cent). Other anesthetics were used to a lesser degree. Further analysis revealed no statistically-significant differences in the use of local anesthetics among dentists who responded to the survey and non-responders. The results of this survey document the current use of local anesthetics in dentistry.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7736333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of prilocaine for the reduction of pain associated with transmucosal anesthetic administration.

Authors:  L F Kramp; P D Eleazer; J P Scheetz
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1999

2.  Drug therapy during pregnancy: implications for dental practice.

Authors:  A Ouanounou; D A Haas
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Effect of PaCO2 and PaO2 on lidocaine and articaine toxicity.

Authors:  K C Barcelos; D P Furtado; J C Ramacciato; A M Cabral; D A Haas
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

4.  Allergic reaction in the use of primacaine adrenaline.

Authors:  Hui Xia He; Lin Feng; Hong Chen Liu
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Ravi Sood; Manoj-Kumar Hans; Shashit Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A clinical study.

Authors:  Sunith Maruthingal; Dennis Mohan; Ramesh Kumar Maroli; Ali Alahmari; Ahmed Alqahtani; Mohammed Alsadoon
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

7.  Articaine (4%) with epinephrine (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) in inferior alveolar nerve block: Effects on the vital signs and onset, and duration of anesthesia.

Authors:  Esshagh Lasemi; Mehdi Sezavar; Leyla Habibi; Seyfollah Hemmat; Farzin Sarkarat; Zahra Nematollahi
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.

Authors:  Myong-Hwan Karm; Fiona Daye Park; Moonkyu Kang; Hyun Jeong Kim; Jeong Wan Kang; Seungoh Kim; Yong-Deok Kim; Cheul-Hong Kim; Kwang-Suk Seo; Kyung-Hwan Kwon; Chul-Hwan Kim; Jung-Woo Lee; Sung-Woon Hong; Mi Hyoung Lim; Seung Kwan Nam; Jae Min Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.