Literature DB >> 7733123

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial of intermittent nasal salmon calcitonin for prevention of postmenopausal lumbar spine bone loss.

J Y Reginster1, R Deroisy, M P Lecart, N Sarlet, B Zegels, I Jupsin, M de Longueville, P Franchimont.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nasal administration of salmon calcitonin (SCT) has been suggested for preventing trabecular bone loss during the first years following the menopause, but no conclusive evidence has appeared about the minimal effective dose. Since nasal calcitonin is highly expensive, it makes sense to define this dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center study with a 3-arm parallel-group design. The subjects were 251 healthy women who had experienced natural menopause within the past 6 to 72 months and were not affected by any diseases or treatments that interfere with calcium metabolism. They were randomly allocated in groups of 6 to receive intranasal SCT 50 IU (n = 84), SCT 200 IU (n = 84), or placebo (n = 83). All treatments were given on 5 consecutive days per week. Statistical analysis was based on two populations: intention-to-treat (IT) and valid completers (VC). The main assessments performed were bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (LSBMD) and biochemical parameters reflecting bone turnover (serum alkaline phosphatase, urinary calcium/creatinine, and hydroxyproline/creatinine ratios).
RESULTS: Changes over the treatment period were comparable in the IT and VC populations. In the group receiving the placebo, LSBMD decreased from baseline to end point by a mean of 6.28% (95% confidence interval [CI] -7.69 to -4.89) in the IT population and 6.98% (95% CI -8.86 to -5.11) in the VC population (P = 0.0001, end LSBMD versus baseline LSBMD). LSBMD increased slightly with the 50-IU/d dose of SCT, by 0.82% (95% CI -0.26 to 1.89) in the IT population, and 0.51% (95% CI -0.69 to 1.72) in the VC (P = NS, versus baseline). Subjects who received SCT 200 IU/d experienced significant increases of 2.03% (95% CI 0.92 to 3.15) in the IT population and 2.26% (95% CI 1.01 to 3.51) in the VC (both P = 0.001). The difference between the evolution of the combined groups receiving nasal SCT and the group treated with the placebo was highly significant (P = 0.0001). No significant changes were recorded in biochemical parameters reflecting bone turnover.
CONCLUSIONS: SCT 50 IU/d administered nasally and intermittently appears to prevent lumbar bone loss in nonobese early postmenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7733123     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80344-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  14 in total

Review 1.  Nasal calcitonin.

Authors:  S L Silverman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Intranasal salcatonin (salmon calcitonin). A review of its pharmacological properties and role in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Calcitonin versus etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Cardona; E Pastor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of alendronate and calcitonin on bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. An observational study.

Authors:  Miroslava Hejdova; Vladimir Palicka; Zdenek Kucera; Jiri Vlcek
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-06

5.  25 years of salmon calcitonin: from synthesis to therapeutic use.

Authors:  M Azria; D H Copp; J M Zanelli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Osteoporosis: the increasing role of the orthopaedist.

Authors:  M B Dobbs; J Buckwalter; C Saltzman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

Review 8.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 9. Calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  K Siminoski; R G Josse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kenneth G Saag; Piet Geusens
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.