Literature DB >> 7732996

Comparison of outcome of cardiac rehabilitation in black women and white women.

L B Cannistra1, C J O'Malley, G J Balady.   

Abstract

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death among black women in the United States. Black women also demonstrate a greater prevalence of coronary risk factors and a higher mortality after myocardial infarction than white women. To evaluate the clinical profile and outcome of black women in an urban-based cardiac rehabilitation program, 35 black women (aged 54 +/- 13 years) and 47 white women (aged 57 +/- 10 years) were prospectively studied. Black women had similar admitting diagnoses as white women, with recent myocardial infarction being the most common (37%). Coronary risk factors were more prevalent in black women than white women in the program: hypertension (71% vs 53%; p = 0.09) diabetes mellitus (46% vs 26%; p = 0.06), obesity (74% vs 49%; p < 0.05). Cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein levels were similarly elevated in black (251 +/- 53 mg/dl) and in white (248 +/- 52 mg/dl) women, whereas 34% of black and 21% of white women were active smokers. There was no significant difference in initial exercise capacity at program entry. Fewer black women (51%) completed the 12-week program than white women (64%), p = NS. Comparison of initial and follow-up exercise tests after 12 weeks of moderate to high-intensity dynamic exercise demonstrated significant and similar improvements in functional capacity in both black (4.2 +/- 1.6 vs 5.6 +/- 1.7 METs; p < 0.001) and white (4.8 +/- 2.2 vs 5.7 +/- 2.2 METs; p < 0.01) women. Among obese patients, only the white women lost weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7732996     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80682-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Dinnes; J Kleijnen; M Leitner; D Thompson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

2.  Organizing services for cardiovascular prevention.

Authors:  Robert C Block; Thomas A Pearson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

Review 3.  Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Authors:  Karam I Turk-Adawi; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.975

Review 4.  Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors.

Authors:  L Jackson; J Leclerc; Y Erskine; W Linden
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  The impact of training modalities on the clinical benefits of exercise intervention in patients with cardiovascular disease risk or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Luc J C van Loon; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Disparities in the Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation in African Americans.

Authors:  Lena Mathews; Ofure Akhiwu; Monica Mukherjee; Roger S Blumenthal; Kunihiro Matsushita; Chiadi E Ndumele
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2022-05-07

7.  Disparities in women's referral to and enrollment in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jerilyn K Allen; Lisa Benz Scott; Kerry J Stewart; Deborah Rohm Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  A Review of Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation: EVIDENCE, DRIVERS, AND SOLUTIONS.

Authors:  Lena Mathews; LaPrincess C Brewer
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 9.  Rehabilitation in cardiac patients:what do we know about training modalities?

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Jan Berger; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.928

10.  Home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or revascularisation: design and rationale of the Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN72884263].

Authors:  Kate Jolly; Gregory Y H Lip; Josie Sandercock; Sheila M Greenfield; James P Raftery; Jonathan Mant; Rod Taylor; Deirdre Lane; Kaeng Wai Lee; A J Stevens
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 2.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.