Literature DB >> 7732468

On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain in general practice. A criteria-based review of the literature.

H M van den Hoogen1, B W Koes, J T van Eijk, L M Bouter.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A criteria-based review of the literature was conducted regarding the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain.
OBJECTIVES: To perform meta-analysis of the literature regarding signs and symptoms in diagnosing radiculopathy, ankylosing spondylitis, and vertebral cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Diagnosing low back pain, especially in general practice, depends largely on history taking, physical examination, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. No previous review has assessed the diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms in a systematic way, taking into account the methodological quality of studies.
METHODS: The literature was reviewed for relevant studies. Retrieved studies were independently rated for methodological quality by two reviewers. The reported sensitivity and specificity in the rated studies were reviewed.
RESULTS: Thirty-six eligible studies were retrieved. Major methodological shortcomings were observed, and only 19 studies scored > or = 55 points (maximal score 100). Not one single test appeared to have high sensitivity and high specificity in radiculopathy. The combined history and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate had relatively high diagnostic accuracy in vertebral cancer. Getting out of bed at night and reduced lateral mobility seemed to be the only moderately accurate items in ankylosing spondylitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies that take into account the shortcomings identified would be needed to produce definite conclusions. Few of the studied signs and symptoms seemed to be valuable diagnostics for radiculopathy, ankylosing spondylitis, and vertebral cancer. Reproducibility of signs and symptoms over time might be a valuable diagnostic criterion. However, this was neglected in almost all studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7732468     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.

Authors:  H C de Vet; T van der Weijden; J W Muris; J Heyrman; F Buntinx; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.

Authors:  H J van den Hoogen; B W Koes; W Devillé; J T van Eijk; L M Bouter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Priming of NADPH oxidase by tumor necrosis factor alpha in patients with inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  R Miesel; R Hartung; H Kroeger
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 4.  Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Pharmacological management of low back pain.

Authors:  Roger Chou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  When does the patient with a disc herniation undergo lumbosacral discectomy?

Authors:  P C Vroomen; M C de Krom; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression.

Authors:  P C A J Vroomen; M C T F M de Krom; J T Wilmink; A D M Kester; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Authors:  Suzan Coster; Sebastiaan F T M de Bruijn; Dénes L J Tavy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review.

Authors:  Arianne P Verhagen; Aron Downie; Nahid Popal; Chris Maher; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Symptomatic improvement in function and disease activity in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis utilizing a course of chiropractic therapy: a prospective case study.

Authors:  Susan M Rutherford; Cameron F Nicolson; Edward R Crowther
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.