Literature DB >> 7732341

Factors associated with participation in screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing.

E Lindholm1, B Berglund, E Haglind, J Kewenter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with attending screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing was studied.
METHODS: Sixty-eight per cent of 34,144 subjects participated in the primary screening and/or rescreening in a randomized screening study. The mortality and causes of death in the two groups were studied. A sample of the subjects received a questionnaire, in which they were asked about their reaction to the invitation. A statistical sample was called for a telephone interview.
RESULTS: The mortality among the non-attenders was higher than among the attenders (p < 0.001), which might reflect a higher morbidity among the non-attenders. The mortality was equal in the test and control groups. There was no difference among the attenders and non-attenders who had a full or 50% pension. Among immigrants the attitude to screening was less positive among those born in 1918 but was the same as that of the whole group among those born in 1929. Significantly fewer persons among the non-attenders than among the attenders could be reached for a telephone interview (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: There is a possibility that the compliance can be increased. The non-attenders' attitude to screening was more negative than that of the attenders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7732341     DOI: 10.3109/00365529509093257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Access to health care for ethnic minority populations.

Authors:  A Szczepura
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Deborah J del Junco; Jasmin A Tiro; Sharon P Coan; Catherine A Perz; Lori A Bastian; William Rakowski; Wen Chan; David R Lairson; Amy McQueen; Maria E Fernandez; Cynthia Warrick; Arada Halder; Carlo DiClemente
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Can colorectal cancer mass-screening organization be evidence-based? Lessons from failures: the experimental and pilot phases of the Lazio program.

Authors:  Antonio Federici; Alessandra Barca; Diego Baiocchi; Francesco Quadrino; Sabrina Valle; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns over 15 years for UK south Asian ethnic minority populations, corrected for differences in socio-demographic characteristics.

Authors:  Ala Szczepura; Charlotte Price; Anil Gumber
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.