Literature DB >> 7731951

Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques.

I A Vakser1, C Aflalo.   

Abstract

In the classical procedures for predicting the structure of protein complexes two molecules are brought in contact at multiple relative positions, the extent of complementarity (geometric and/or energy) at the surface of contact is assessed at each position, and the best fits are retrieved. In view of the higher occurrence of hydrophobic groups at contact sites, their contribution results in more intermolecular atom-atom contacts per unit area for correct matches than for false positive fits. The hydrophobic groups are also potentially less flexible at the surface. Thus, from a practical point of view, a partial representation of the molecules based on hydrophobic groups should improve the quality of the results in finding molecular recognition sites, as compared to full representation. We tested this proposal by applying the idea to an existing geometric fit procedure and compared the results obtained with full vs. hydrophobic representations of molecules in known molecular complexes. The hydrophobic docking yielded distinctly higher signal-to-noise ratio so that the correct match is discriminated better from false positive fits. It appears that nonhydrophobic groups contribute more to false matches. The results are discussed in terms of their relevance to molecular recognition techniques as compared to energy calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7731951     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340200405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  50 in total

1.  Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein-protein recognition.

Authors:  S R Kimura; R C Brower; S Vajda; C J Camacho
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes.

Authors:  G M Verkhivker; D Bouzida; D K Gehlhaar; P A Rejto; S Arthurs; A B Colson; S T Freer; V Larson; B A Luty; T Marrone; P W Rose
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein--protein complexes.

Authors:  I A Vakser; O G Matar; C F Lam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates.

Authors:  Juan Fernández-Recio; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  How common is the funnel-like energy landscape in protein-protein interactions?

Authors:  A Tovchigrechko; I A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Electrostatics in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Alexander Heifetz; Ephraim Katchalski-Katzir; Miriam Eisenstein
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Protein docking along smooth association pathways.

Authors:  C J Camacho; S Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: a systematic docking study.

Authors:  Sulin Jiang; Andrei Tovchigrechko; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Docking of protein models.

Authors:  Andrei Tovchigrechko; Christopher A Wells; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Fragment-based identification of druggable 'hot spots' of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques.

Authors:  Ryan Brenke; Dima Kozakov; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dmitri Beglov; David Hall; Melissa R Landon; Carla Mattos; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.