Literature DB >> 7730843

Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests in acute maxillary sinusitis determined by maximum likelihood in the absence of an external standard.

G H de Bock1, J J Houwing-Duistermaat, M P Springer, J Kievit, J C van Houwelingen.   

Abstract

This study shows how to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of test sensitivities and specificities in case of lack of an external standard, using the Expectation Maximisation (EM) algorithm. This method is used to compare four diagnostic tests in patients suspected of acute maxillary sinusitis. Data were analyzed from published studies. Antral aspiration is the test with the highest diagnostic value. The diagnostic value of a positive clinical examination (according to explicit criteria) and of a positive radiograph or ultrasound are comparable. A negative radiograph is of more diagnostic value than a negative clinical examination or ultrasound. The width of the confidence intervals may be too small, due to model deviations which may give incorrect standard errors. However, the estimated likelihood ratios adequately reflect the relative value of the diagnostic tests considered, even when the assumption of independence is dropped.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7730843     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90078-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  11 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and general practice.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Controversies in management: should general practitioners perform diagnostic tests on patients before prescribing antibiotics?

Authors:  H J Kolmos; P Little
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

3.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines--unabridged version: S2 guidelines from the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; R Weber; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Challenges with diagnoses: sketchy reference standards.

Authors:  Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

5.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  The end of antibiotic treatment in adults with acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice? A placebo-controlled double-blind randomized doxycycline trial.

Authors:  W Stalman; G A van Essen; Y van der Graaf; R A de Melker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  [Guideline for "rhinosinusitis"-long version : S2k guideline of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians and the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; A Beule; D Jobst; L Klimek; M Laudien; M Lell; T J Vogl; U Popert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Determinants for the course of acute sinusitis in adult general practice patients.

Authors:  W A Stalman; G A van Essen; Y van der Graaf
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jack B Anon; Michael R Jacobs; Michael D Poole; Paul G Ambrose; Mark S Benninger; James A Hadley; William A Craig
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Hospital-acquired sinusitis is a common cause of fever of unknown origin in orotracheally intubated critically ill patients.

Authors:  Arthur R H van Zanten; J Mark Dixon; Martine D Nipshagen; Remco de Bree; Armand R J Girbes; Kees H Polderman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.