Literature DB >> 7730389

Fracture toughness of human bone under tension.

T L Norman1, D Vashishth, D B Burr.   

Abstract

The longitudinal fracture toughnesses of human cortical bone were compared to those of bovine cortical bone to test the hypothesis that although human osteonal bone is significantly weaker and more compliant than primary (plexiform) bone, it is not less tough than primary bone. The fracture toughness indices, critical strain energy release rate (Gc) and critical stress intensity factor (Kc), were determined for human Haversian bone and bovine bone under tension (Mode I) loading using the compact tension method. The effects of thickness, crack growth range and anisotropy on fracture indices for slow stable crack growth in cortical bone were determined. Plane strain assumptions required for application of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to bone were investigated. Longitudinal oriented fracture toughness tests were used to assess the crack inhibiting effect of human bone microstructure on fracture resistance. Human bone Kc calculated from the stress concentration formula for 2 and 3 mm thick specimens equaled 4.32 and 4.05 MN m-3/2, respectively. Human bone Gc calculated from the compliance method equaled 827 N m-1 for 2 mm thick specimens and 595 N m-1 for 3 mm thick specimens. It was found that crack growth range, thickness and material assumptions affect fracture toughness. Kc calculated from Gc using an anisotropic relation provided the lowest estimate of Kc and equaled 3.31 MN m-3/2 for 2 mm thick specimens and 2.81 MN m-3/2 for 3 mm thick specimens. Both Kc and Gc were significantly reduced after being adjusted to ASTM standard thickness using ratios determined from bovine bone. The fracture toughness of bovine bone relative to human bone ranged from 1.08 to 1.66. This was compared to the longitudinal strength of bovine bone relative to the longitudinal strength of human bone which is approximately equal to 1.5. We found that even though human bone is significantly weaker than bovine bone, relative to its strength, the toughness of human and bovine bone are roughly similar, but the data were not sufficiently definitive to answer the question of which is tougher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7730389     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00069-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  24 in total

1.  High density polyetherurethane foam as a fragmentation and radiographic surrogate for cortical bone.

Authors:  C L Beardsley; A D Heiner; E A Brandser; J L Marsh; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

2.  Spatial variation in osteon population density at the human femoral midshaft: histomorphometric adaptations to habitual load environment.

Authors:  Timothy P Gocha; Amanda M Agnew
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A novel scratching approach for measuring age-related changes in the in situ toughness of bone.

Authors:  X Wang; Y J Yoon; H Ji
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  The role of osteocytes and bone microstructure in preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jan G Hazenberg; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Promising trends of bioceramics in the biomaterials field.

Authors:  D Arcos; I Izquierdo-Barba; M Vallet-Regí
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Hierarchy of Bone Microdamage at Multiple Length Scales.

Authors:  Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Int J Fatigue       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.186

7.  Splitting fracture in bovine bone using a porosity-based spring network model.

Authors:  Ashwij Mayya; P Praveen; Anuradha Banerjee; R Rajesh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  The Le Fort system revisited: Trauma velocity predicts the path of Le Fort I fractures through the lateral buttress.

Authors:  Grayson Roumeliotis; Romy Ahluwalia; Thomas Jenkyn; Arjang Yazdani
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  Small animal bone biomechanics.

Authors:  Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  The role of nanoscale toughening mechanisms in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Philipp J Thurner; Orestis L Katsamenis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.