Literature DB >> 7730172

The effects of regrouping on behavioral and production parameters in finishing swine.

J M Stookey1, H W Gonyou.   

Abstract

Three trials involving 396 pigs were conducted to determine the effects of regrouping finishing swine (83.8 +/- .69 kg) on weight gain and behavior during the subsequent 2-wk period. The methodology between Trials 1, 2, and 3 differed primarily in the total number of pigs tested (72, 144, and 180, respectively) and the number of pigs per pen (3, 3 or 5, and 5, respectively). In all trials, like-sexed pigs were moved into a new pen location and allotted to one of three treatments: 1) a group of familiar pen mates (Control), 2) a group composed of unfamiliar pigs (Mixed), and 3) pigs mixed with strangers for 24 h and then reunited with original pen mates for the duration of the trial (Mixed 24 h). In the pooled analysis, control pigs gained faster (P < .01) than Mixed pigs (.87 and .77 kg/d, respectively) over the 2-wk period. Mixed 24-h pigs were intermediate in gain (.80 kg/d), indicating that the most severe aggression normally observed during the first 24 h accounts for only a portion of the setback. Apparently the negative social stress associated with being in the presence of unfamiliar pigs persisted beyond the first 24 h and was sufficient to limit weight gain over the 2-wk period. Time spent fighting was reduced from 1.72 min/h during a 6-h period on d 1 to .39 min/h during a 3-h period by d 2 in the Mixed group. Fighting was still observed in the Mixed pens 8 d after regrouping (.23 min/h), indicative of ongoing social conflicts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7730172     DOI: 10.2527/1994.72112804x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Rethinking cull boar transport.

Authors:  Trevor J Hook; Joseph M Stookey; Harvey Wagner
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Modern approaches to understanding stress and disease susceptibility: A review with special emphasis on respiratory disease.

Authors:  Palok Aich; Andrew A Potter; Philip J Griebel
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2009-07-30

3.  Effects of Mixing on the Aggressive Behavior of Commercially Housed Pigs.

Authors:  Shin-Jae Rhim; Seung-Hun Son; Hyun-Su Hwang; Jae-Kang Lee; Joon-Ki Hong
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Selection based on indirect genetic effects for growth, environmental enrichment and coping style affect the immune status of pigs.

Authors:  Inonge Reimert; T Bas Rodenburg; Winanda W Ursinus; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Emotions on the loose: emotional contagion and the role of oxytocin in pigs.

Authors:  Inonge Reimert; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Bas Kemp; T Bas Rodenburg
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Psychosocial Stress and Immunity-What Can We Learn From Pig Studies?

Authors:  Ulrike Gimsa; Margret Tuchscherer; Ellen Kanitz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Stress and its influence on reproduction in pigs: a review.

Authors:  Stig Einarsson; Ylva Brandt; Nils Lundeheim; Andrzej Madej
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Indirect genetic effects and housing conditions in relation to aggressive behaviour in pigs.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Simon P Turner; Piter Bijma; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automatic Recognition of Aggressive Behavior in Pigs Using a Kinect Depth Sensor.

Authors:  Jonguk Lee; Long Jin; Daihee Park; Yongwha Chung
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Social network properties predict chronic aggression in commercial pig systems.

Authors:  Simone Foister; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson; Rainer Roehe; Gareth Arnott; Laura Boyle; Simon Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.