Literature DB >> 7729967

Selective abortion: a new moral order? Consensus and debate in the medical community.

L Bouchard1, M Renaud, O Kremp, L Dallaire.   

Abstract

The authors discuss the results of a survey of the attitudes of Canadian and French (Picardie, Nord-Pas de Calais) physicians toward selective abortion of fetal anomalies detected by ultrasound, amniocentesis, or chorionic villus sampling. The study documents the threshold of acceptability of abortion of fetuses with selected anomalies, as well as the physicians' own perceptions of their role in the decision to abort. While there was no consensus among all Canadian physicians regarding the acceptability of abortion, more than 55 percent from France and Quebec would accept selective abortion of a fetus affected with trisomy 21, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, Huntington's chorea, or spina bifida. In the province of Quebec, Anglophone physicians showed a greater acceptance of abortion than did their French-speaking colleagues. In reference to the physician's role in the decision to abort, French physicians are more directive than North American physicians. Cultural predispositions may explain these differences in attitudes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Abortion, Induced; Abortion, Selective; Americas; Amniocentesis; Attitude; Behavior; Biology; Canada; Delivery Of Health Care; Developed Countries; Endocrine System; Ethics; Europe; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; France; Genetic Technics; Gonadotropins; Gonadotropins, Chorionic; Health; Health Personnel; Hormones; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Mediterranean Countries; North America; Northern America; Physicians; Physiology; Psychological Factors; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Surveys; Ultrasonics; Western Europe

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7729967     DOI: 10.2190/TGDE-KMAP-6JYG-0T8N

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  5 in total

1.  Down's syndrome screening is unethical: views of today's research ethics committees.

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Current status of prenatal management of fetal spina bifida in the world: worldwide cooperative survey on the medico-ethical issue.

Authors:  Shizuo Oi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The ethics of antenatal screening: lessons from Canute.

Authors:  Timothy M Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-11

4.  The triple test as a screening technique for Down syndrome: reliability and relevance.

Authors:  Tim Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

5.  Attitudes of pregnant women and mothers of children with orofacial clefts toward prenatal diagnosis of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts in a semiurban set-up in India.

Authors:  Poornima Kadagad; Pascal Pinto; Rajesh Powar
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.