Literature DB >> 7729019

Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.

E A Caracciolo1, K B Davis, G Sopko, G C Kaiser, S D Corley, H Schaff, H A Taylor, B R Chaitman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined severe proximal left anterior descending and proximal left circumflex coronary artery disease, or left main equivalent (LMEQ) disease, defines a prognostic high-risk angiographic subset of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. While numerous observational and randomized clinical trials showed prolonged survival in surgically compared with medically treated patients with left main coronary artery disease, relatively few observational studies compared surgical and medical therapies in patients with LMEQ disease. The present report of 912 patients with LMEQ disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry extends the originally published 5-year surgical and medical group survival analysis to more than 16 years of follow-up and permits analysis of LMEQ patient subgroups. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The CASS Registry contains 912 patients with LMEQ disease, defined as combined stenoses of > or = 70% in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery before the first septal perforator and proximal circumflex coronary artery before the first obtuse marginal branch, initially treated with either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The 15-year cumulative survival estimates were 44% for the 630 patients in the surgical group and 31% for the 282 patients in the medical group. Median survival in the surgical group was 13.1 years (12.7 to 14.1 years, 95% confidence limits) compared with only 6.2 years (4.8 to 7.9 years) in the medical group (difference, 6.9 years; P < .0001). Median survival was also significantly longer in the surgical group stratified by age, sex, anginal class, left ventricular (LV) function, and coronary anatomy. However, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery did not significantly prolong median survival in patient subgroups with (1) normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (> or = 70%) also was present, and (2) mildly abnormal (LV score, 6 to 10) LV systolic function. The 15-year cumulative survival in patients with normal LV systolic function in the surgical and medical groups was 63% and 54%, respectively. Median survival was > 15 years in both the surgical and medical groups (P = NS). In patients with normal LV systolic function and right coronary artery stenosis > or = 70%, the 15-year cumulative survival was also similar in the surgical and medical groups (63% and 53%, respectively). Median survival was > 15 years in both the surgical and medical groups (P = NS). The 15-year cumulative survival estimates in all subgroups were affected by convergence of the surgical and medical group survival curves caused by a disproportionate increase in late surgical group mortality. Overall, 26% of patients in the medical group ultimately underwent CABG surgery. If all medical group patients had survived long enough, about 65% would be estimated to have had surgery by 15 years. When the CASS Registry patients with LMEQ disease who participated in the randomized trial or who were randomizable were analyzed, CABG surgery did not prolong the 15-year cumulative survival estimates compared with nonsurgical therapy for randomized (71% versus 67%, respectively) and for randomizable patients (62% versus 92%, respectively) with an LV ejection fraction > or = 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: This report, which extends follow-up of more than 16 years in CASS Registry patients with LMEQ disease, shows that CABG surgery prolongs life in most clinical and angiographic subgroups. However, median survival was not prolonged by CABG surgery in patients with normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (> or = 70%) also was present or in patients with an LV ejection fraction > or = 50% who participated in the CASS randomized trial or who were randomizable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7729019     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  31 in total

1.  Bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Desch; E Boudriot; A Rastan; P E Buszman; A Bochenek; F W Mohr; G Schuler; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Revascularization Strategies for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Bennet George; Naoki Misumida; Khaled M Ziada
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Evidence-based treatment of unprotected left main disease: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Peter Sharis; Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  James J Jang; Manjushri Bhapkar; Adrian Coles; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Fordyce; Kerry L Lee; James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann; Jean-Claude Tardif; W Schuyler Jones; Daniel B Mark; Vincent L Sorrell; Andrey Espinoza; Pamela S Douglas; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  The triple rule-out for acute ischemic stroke: imaging the brain, carotid arteries, aorta, and heart.

Authors:  A D Furtado; D D Adraktas; N Brasic; S-C Cheng; K Ordovas; W S Smith; M R Lewin; K Chun; J D Chien; S Schaeffer; Max Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Integrated imaging of cardiac anatomy, physiology, and viability.

Authors:  James A Arrighi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Combining PCI and CABG: the role of hybrid revascularization.

Authors:  Kelly D Green; Donald R Lynch; Tyffany P Chen; David Zhao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Therapeutic hypothermia in combination with percutaneous coronary intervention in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurisu; Ichiro Inoue; Takuji Kawagoe; Masaharu Ishihara; Yuji Shimatani; Yasuharu Nakama; Tatsuya Maruhashi; Eisuke Kagawa; Kazuoki Dai; Junichi Matsushita; Hiroki Ikenaga
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Treatment of chronic CAD--do the guidelines (ESC, AHA) reflect daily practice?

Authors:  Harald Tillmanns; Ali Erdogan; Daniel Sedding
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.