Literature DB >> 7729018

Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.

E A Caracciolo1, K B Davis, G Sopko, G C Kaiser, S D Corley, H Schaff, H A Taylor, B R Chaitman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational and randomized studies designed to compare surgical and medical therapies in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCD) have shown that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery prolongs life in most patients with LMCD. The present report of 1484 patients with LMCD in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry extends the originally published 5-year surgical and medical group survival analysis to more than 16 years of follow-up and permits analysis of LMCD patient subgroups. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The CASS Registry contains 1484 patients with > or = 50% left main coronary artery stenosis initially treated with either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The 15-year cumulative survival estimates were 37% for the 1153 patients in the surgical group compared with 27% for the 331 patients in the medical group. Median survival in the surgical group was 13.3 years (12.8 to 13.8 years, 95% confidence limits) compared with only 6.6 years (5.4 to 7.9 years) in the medical group (difference, 6.7 years; P < .0001). Median survival was also significantly longer in the surgical group stratified by age, sex, anginal class, left ventricular (LV) function, coronary anatomy, and the extent of LMCD. However, CABG surgery did not significantly prolong median survival in patient subgroups with (1) left main coronary stenosis of 50% to 59%; (2) normal LV systolic function; (3) normal or mildly abnormal LV systolic function and a right coronary artery stenosis > or = 70%; and (4) a nonstenotic (< or = 70%) right coronary artery. The 15-year cumulative survival for patients with normal LV systolic function in the surgical and medical groups was 42% and 51%, respectively. Median survival was 14.7 years in the surgical group and > 15 years in the medical group (P = NS). In patients with normal LV systolic function and a right coronary artery stenosis > or = 70%, the 15-year cumulative survival rates were also similar in the surgical and medical groups (40% and 48%, respectively). Median survival was 14.3 years in the surgical group and 14.2 years in the medical group (P = NS). The 15-year cumulative survival estimates for all subgroups were affected by convergence of the surgical and medical survival group curves owing to a disproportionate increase in the late surgical group mortality. Overall, 25% of patients in the medical group ultimately underwent CABG surgery. If all medical group patients had survived long enough, about 47% would be estimated to have had surgery by 15 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This report, which extends follow-up of more than 16 years in CASS Registry patients with LMCD, shows that CABG surgery prolongs life in most clinical and angiographic subgroups. However, median survival was not prolonged by CABG surgery in patients with normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (> or = 70%) also was present. These results extend our understanding of the natural history of LMCD and permit a more accurate estimate of long-term surgical and medical group survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7729018     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  37 in total

1.  Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G J Bech; H Droste; N H Pijls; B De Bruyne; J J Bonnier; H R Michels; K H Peels; J J Koolen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Left main stem coronary disease: the case for percutaneous coronary intervention in a high risk patient with complex disease.

Authors:  K Kosuga; H Tamai
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Left main coronary artery thrombus: a case series with different outcomes.

Authors:  Rajiv Gupta; Mohammed A Rahman; Barry F Uretsky; Ernst R Schwarz
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Left main coronary artery stenosis: factors predicting cardiac events in patients awaiting coronary surgery.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; Cesar E Mendoza; Alexandre C Ferreira; Eduardo de Marchena
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

5.  Prevalence of left main coronary artery disease among patients referred to multislice computed tomography coronary examinations.

Authors:  Gökmen Gemici; Tahsin Guneysu; Elif Eroğlu; Fatih Bayrak; Deniz Sevinc; Semih Aytaclar; Zafer Kaya; Bulent Mutlu; Muzaffer Degertekin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Vascular Medicine Endorsed by the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Impact of left main coronary artery disease on long-term mortality in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Se Hun Kang; Cheol Whan Lee; Seunghee Baek; Pil Hyung Lee; Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?

Authors:  T Stiermaier; G Schuler; E Boudriot; S Desch; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Long term follow up after elective percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected non-bifurcational left main stenosis: is it time to change the guidelines?

Authors:  B R G Brueren; J M P G Ernst; M J Suttorp; J M ten Berg; B J W M Rensing; E G Mast; E T Bal; A J Six; H W M Plokker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Assessing the risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Jean-François Légaré; Alex MacLean; Karen J Buth; John A Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.