Literature DB >> 7724876

Melatonin suppression by static and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: relationship to the reported increased incidence of cancer.

R J Reiter1.   

Abstract

An increased cancer incidence has been reported in individuals living and/or working in an environment in which they are exposed to higher than normal artificial electromagnetic fields. One of the most uniform changes associated with the exposure of animals to either pulsed static geomagnetic fields or to sinusoidal extremely low frequency magnetic fields has been a reduction in high night-time levels of melatonin. Melatonin is a hormone produced especially at night in the pineal gland, a pea-sized organ near the center of the human brain. The high nocturnal production of melatonin leads to elevated blood melatonin levels at night as well. The exposure of humans or animals to light (visible electromagnetic radiation) at night rapidly depresses pineal melatonin production and blood melatonin levels. Likewise, the exposure of animals to various pulsed static and extremely low frequency magnetic fields also reduces melatonin levels. Melatonin is a potent oncostatic agent and it prevents both the initiation and promotion of cancer. Reduction of melatonin, at night, by any means, increases cells' vulnerability to alteration by carcinogenic agents. Thus, if in fact artificial electromagnetic field exposure increases the incidence of cancer in humans, a plausible mechanism could involve a reduction in melatonin which is the consequence of such exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7724876     DOI: 10.1515/reveh.1994.10.3-4.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Health        ISSN: 0048-7554            Impact factor:   3.458


  10 in total

Review 1.  Reported biological consequences related to the suppression of melatonin by electric and magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  R J Reiter
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec

2.  Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among electric utility workers in Ontario: the evaluation of alternate indices of exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields.

Authors:  P J Villeneuve; D A Agnew; A B Miller; P N Corey
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Are stress responses to geomagnetic storms mediated by the cryptochrome compass system?

Authors:  James Close
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Cancer incidence among male railway engine-drivers and conductors in Sweden, 1976-90.

Authors:  L Alfredsson; N Hammar; S Karlehagen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  The protective role of antioxidants in the defence against ROS/RNS-mediated environmental pollution.

Authors:  Borut Poljšak; Rok Fink
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Occupational electromagnetic field exposures associated with sleep quality: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Guangdi Chen; Yifeng Pan; Zexin Chen; Wen Jin; Chuan Sun; Chunjing Chen; Xuanjun Dong; Kun Chen; Zhengping Xu; Shanchun Zhang; Yunxian Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resveratrol may reverse the effects of long-term occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields on workers of a power plant.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Yang Zhang; Baoyu Zhu; He Zhang; Ye Sun; Chengxun Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 8.  Melatonin: Regulation of Prion Protein Phase Separation in Cancer Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  Doris Loh; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Advances in Residential Design Related to the Influence of Geomagnetism.

Authors:  Francisco Glaria; Israel Arnedo; Ana Sánchez-Ostiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Radiation Exposure Predicts Reported Vaccine Adverse Effects in Veterans with Gulf War Illness.

Authors:  Beatrice A Golomb; Emily Nguyen; Eero Dinkeloo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.