Literature DB >> 7724309

Adolescents' misinterpretation of health risk probability expressions.

L D Cohn1, M Schydlower, J Foley, R L Copeland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if differences exist between adolescents and physicians in their numerical translation of 13 commonly used probability expressions (eg, possibly, might).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Adolescent medicine and pediatric orthopedic outpatient units. PARTICIPANTS: 150 adolescents and 51 pediatricians, pediatric orthopedic surgeons, and nurses. MEASUREMENT: Numerical ratings of the degree of certainty implied by 13 probability expressions (eg, possibly, probably).
RESULTS: Adolescents were significantly more likely than physicians to display comprehension errors, reversing or equating the meaning of terms such as probably/possibly and likely/possibly. Numerical expressions of uncertainty (eg, 30% chance) elicited less variability in ratings than lexical expressions of uncertainty (eg, possibly).
CONCLUSION: Physicians should avoid using probability expressions such as probably, possibly, and likely when communicating health risks to children and adolescents. Numerical expressions of uncertainty may be more effective for conveying the likelihood of an illness than lexical expressions of uncertainty (eg, probably).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7724309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

Review 1.  Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Al Mulley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

Review 2.  Risk communication in the patient-health professional relationship.

Authors:  S Buetow; J Cantrill; B Sibbald
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1998-09

3.  Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine.

Authors:  A Edwards; L Prior
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  The patient perspective. What should a new anti-asthma agent provide?

Authors:  L Osman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Effect of communication strategy on personal risk perception and treatment adherence intentions.

Authors:  Sean Young; Daniel M Oppenheimer
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  What do adolescent girls experience when they visit family practitioners?

Authors:  I Oandasan; R Malik
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Annette M O'Connor; Elizabeth Drake; Jennifer Biggs; Valerie Hum; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Comparative risk judgements for oral health hazards among Norwegian adults: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Anne Astrøm
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.