Literature DB >> 7723956

Ultrasound findings in carotid artery dissection: analysis of 43 patients.

M Sturzenegger1, H P Mattle, A Rivoir, R W Baumgartner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To analyze the value of ultrasound for early diagnosis and follow-up of internal carotid artery dissection.
METHODS: The carotid arteries were evaluated in 43 consecutive patients using extracranial and transcranial pulsed-wave Doppler and duplex sonography.
RESULTS: Ultrasound examination was performed, on average, 7.7 days after the first symptoms. The dissections subsequently were verified by MRI (16 patients), angiography (13 patients), or both (14 patients) on average 4.4 days later. The overall sensitivity of the combined examination was 95% (93% for extracranial Doppler, 86% for transcranial Doppler, and 79% for duplex sonography). All three methods detected occlusions or high-grade stenoses in 100% of patients and moderate- or low-grade stenoses in 80% (combined methods), 70% (extracranial Doppler), 40% (transcranial Doppler), and 20% (duplex) of the patients. The findings in 33 patients with an occlusion or high-grade stenosis according to neuroradiology were as follows: absent flow signal in the internal carotid artery (100%) and biphasic (stump) flow in its bulb (86%), high-resistance flow pattern of the ipsilateral common carotid artery (91%), signs of collateral flow across the circle of Willis (97%), and low flow in the middle cerebral artery (79%) on transcranial insonation. In seven patients, a moderate stenosis of the high cervical carotid segment was found because of a retromandibular high-velocity signal. In five of them this was the only abnormal finding. Duplex examination was helpful because it confirmed absent internal carotid artery flow or stump flow in the case of occlusion or high-grade stenosis (100%) and excluded an atherosclerotic origin by demonstrating a patent bulb (100%) and the absence of plaques (95%). Follow-up studies showed recanalization in 63% of patients, occurring at variable intervals. Occlusion persisted in 37%.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound performed within the first weeks can corroborate a clinically suspected carotid dissection in up to 95% of patients. Repetitive follow-up studies in most cases are sufficient to monitor evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7723956     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.45.4.691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  18 in total

1.  Sudden neck movement and cervical artery dissection. The Canadian Stroke Consortium.

Authors:  J W Norris; V Beletsky; Z G Nadareishvili
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-07-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Doppler sonograpy with dynamic testing in a case of aortic dissection extending to the innominate and right common carotid arteries.

Authors:  P Bonnin; C Giannesini; G Amah; J P Kevorkian; F Woimant; B I Levy
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Carotid Artery Dissection.

Authors:  Magdy Selim; Louis R. Caplan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-06

Review 4.  Carotid and vertebral artery dissection syndromes.

Authors:  B Thanvi; S K Munshi; S L Dawson; T G Robinson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Can an ordinary neurological examination induce a dissection of the vertebral artery?: a case report.

Authors:  R Dittrich; I Nassenstein; R Bachmann; E B Ringelstein; G Kuhlenbaumer; D G Nabavi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging features and endovascular treatment.

Authors:  Christine M Flis; H Rolf Jäger; Paul S Sidhu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Characterization of Craniocervical Artery Dissection by Simultaneous MR Noncontrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Q Li; J Wang; H Chen; X Gong; N Ma; K Gao; L He; M Guan; Z Chen; R Li; D Mi; C Yuan; X Zhao; X H Zhao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Carotid thin fluttering bands: A new element of arterial wall remodelling? An ultrasound study.

Authors:  Luca Costanzo; Andrea Sole; Corrado Tamburino; Luigi Di Pino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Negative ultrasound findings in patients with cervical artery dissection. Negative ultrasound in CAD.

Authors:  R Dittrich; R Dziewas; M A Ritter; S P Kloska; R Bachmann; I Nassenstein; G Kuhlenbaumer; W Heindel; E B Ringelstein; D G Nabavi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  [Traumatic dissection of the internal carotid artery following whiplash injury. Diagnostic workup and therapy of an often overlooked but potentially dangerous additional vascular lesion].

Authors:  M Lenz; J Bula-Sternberg; T Koch; P Bula; F Bonnaire
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.