OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the McGill pain questionnaire, translated into Dutch (MPQ-DLV), is a reliable instrument to measure pain. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. SETTING: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Leiden, the Netherlands. METHOD: The MPQ-DLV was administered three times to 92 patients who had physiotherapy: in group I (n = 62) twice before and four hours after physiotherapy treatment, in group II (n = 30) before, directly after and four hours after treatment. The questionnaire consisted of questions to determine (a) the quality and intensity, (b) the localisation and evolution of the pain, (c) the effects of the pain on quality of life and further (d) visual analog pain intensity scales. Subsets of questions were combined into nine indices. For all indices on all three occasions Cronbach's alpha coefficients were determined. Moreover, test-retest correlation coefficients were determined between the scores of the first and second, the first and third, and the second and third occasions. RESULTS: The test-retest correlations of the nine indices and the visual analog pain intensity scales ranged from 0.62 to 0.93 (median: 0.84). Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the indices varied between 0.61 and 0.85 (median: 0.72). CONCLUSION: The MPQ-DLV is a reliable instrument for measuring pain.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the McGill pain questionnaire, translated into Dutch (MPQ-DLV), is a reliable instrument to measure pain. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. SETTING: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Leiden, the Netherlands. METHOD: The MPQ-DLV was administered three times to 92 patients who had physiotherapy: in group I (n = 62) twice before and four hours after physiotherapy treatment, in group II (n = 30) before, directly after and four hours after treatment. The questionnaire consisted of questions to determine (a) the quality and intensity, (b) the localisation and evolution of the pain, (c) the effects of the pain on quality of life and further (d) visual analog pain intensity scales. Subsets of questions were combined into nine indices. For all indices on all three occasions Cronbach's alpha coefficients were determined. Moreover, test-retest correlation coefficients were determined between the scores of the first and second, the first and third, and the second and third occasions. RESULTS: The test-retest correlations of the nine indices and the visual analog pain intensity scales ranged from 0.62 to 0.93 (median: 0.84). Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the indices varied between 0.61 and 0.85 (median: 0.72). CONCLUSION: The MPQ-DLV is a reliable instrument for measuring pain.
Authors: Joukje Oosterman; Laura C Derksen; Albert J M van Wijck; Roy P C Kessels; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Belle V van Rosmalen; Matthanja Bieze; Marc G H Besselink; Pieter Tanis; Joanne Verheij; Saffire S K S Phoa; Olivier Busch; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-08-21 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Matthanja Bieze; Olivier R C Busch; Pieter J Tanis; Joanne Verheij; Saffire S K S Phoa; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Karolien E M Biesheuvel-Leliefeld; Sandra M A Kersten; Henriette E van der Horst; Anneke van Schaik; Claudi L H Bockting; Judith E Bosmans; Filip Smit; Harm W J van Marwijk Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Alide A Tieleman; Kathleen M Jenks; Joke S Kalkman; George Borm; Baziel G M van Engelen Journal: J Neurol Date: 2011-04-03 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Rob J E M Smeets; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Alita Hidding; Arnold D M Kester; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Antonia C M van Geel; J André Knottnerus Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Caroline H G Bastiaenen; Rob A de Bie; Pieter M J C Wolters; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Pieter Leffers; Foekje Stelma; Janneke M Bastiaanssen; Gerard G M Essed; Piet A van den Brandt Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-02-27 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: E L van der Kooi; J S Kalkman; E Lindeman; J C M Hendriks; B G M van Engelen; G Bleijenberg; G W Padberg Journal: J Neurol Date: 2007-03-14 Impact factor: 4.849