Literature DB >> 7722775

Apolipoprotein E genotyping methods for the clinical laboratory.

B Maekawa1, T G Cole, R L Seip, D Bylund.   

Abstract

To select the best method for detecting apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes determined by the three common alleles epsilon 2, epsilon 3 and epsilon 4, we compared the radiolabeled allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) probe assay and the nonisotopic restriction isotyping assay. Leukocytic DNA was extracted from the blood of 93 patients after which the region containing two mutation points coding amino acid residues 112 and 158 was amplified by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplified DNA fragments were spotted on nylon membranes, then hybridized for the ASO probe assay. The amplified DNA fragments were also digested with restriction endonuclease Hhal, followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the restriction isotyping assay. The apo E genotypes determined by both methods for every specimen studied were in complete agreement. Although the radiolabeled ASO probe method was 10 times more sensitive than restriction isotyping on polyacrylamide gel, the two were comparable in accuracy. Additionally, because it is simpler to perform, is less time consuming, and is less expensive, we conclude that the restriction isotyping assay is the more suitable of these two methods for use in a clinical laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7722775     DOI: 10.1002/jcla.1860090112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  2 in total

1.  Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Z B Zeng; J Liu; L F Stam; C H Kao; J M Mercer; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic influences on Alzheimer's disease: evidence of interactions between the genes APOE, APOC1 and ACE in a sample population from the South of Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Fagion Lucatelli; Alessandra Chielle Barros; Vanessa Kappel da Silva; Fernanda da Silva Machado; Pâmela Camini Constantin; Ana Amélia Cipriani Dias; Mara Helena Hutz; Fabiana Michelsen de Andrade
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.