RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To optimize screen-film combinations for equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography [AMBER]), five different film-screen-technique combinations were compared by receiver operating characteristics study of simulated interstitial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Ortho C-Lanex Regular and the Insight Thoracic Imaging HC system were compared in conventional nonequalized technique; T-Mat G-Lanex Regular and T-Max L-Lanex Regular were compared in conventional, nonequalized, and AMBER technique; and an experimental high-contrast, low-noise, near-zero crossover film-screen combination was compared in AMBER technique. Interstitial disease was simulated by superimposing birdseed on the back of a humanoid phantom. Twenty-five posterior-anterior radiographs were made with each technique. Seven observers scored the presence of interstitial disease in each of the quadrants on a 5-point scale following receiver operating characteristic methodology. RESULTS: The highest performance was found with the experimental film-screen-AMBER combination (Az = 0.92) and the lowest with the T-Mat L-Lanex Regular-AMBER combination (Az = 0.83) and the Insight Thoracic Imaging HC system-conventional combination (Az = 0.85). T-Mat L-Lanex Regular-conventional ranked second (Az = 0.90) while T-Mat G-Lanex Regular-conventional (Az = 0.89), T-Mat L-Lanex Regular-AMBER (Az = 0.88) and Ortho-C-Lanex Regular-conventional (Az = 0.87) scored lower. CONCLUSION: Higher contrast films in AMBER improve diagnostic performance, whereas a loss of information is found if the AMBER system is combined with lower contrast films.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To optimize screen-film combinations for equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography [AMBER]), five different film-screen-technique combinations were compared by receiver operating characteristics study of simulated interstitial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Ortho C-Lanex Regular and the Insight Thoracic Imaging HC system were compared in conventional nonequalized technique; T-Mat G-Lanex Regular and T-Max L-Lanex Regular were compared in conventional, nonequalized, and AMBER technique; and an experimental high-contrast, low-noise, near-zero crossover film-screen combination was compared in AMBER technique. Interstitial disease was simulated by superimposing birdseed on the back of a humanoid phantom. Twenty-five posterior-anterior radiographs were made with each technique. Seven observers scored the presence of interstitial disease in each of the quadrants on a 5-point scale following receiver operating characteristic methodology. RESULTS: The highest performance was found with the experimental film-screen-AMBER combination (Az = 0.92) and the lowest with the T-Mat L-Lanex Regular-AMBER combination (Az = 0.83) and the Insight Thoracic Imaging HC system-conventional combination (Az = 0.85). T-Mat L-Lanex Regular-conventional ranked second (Az = 0.90) while T-Mat G-Lanex Regular-conventional (Az = 0.89), T-Mat L-Lanex Regular-AMBER (Az = 0.88) and Ortho-C-Lanex Regular-conventional (Az = 0.87) scored lower. CONCLUSION: Higher contrast films in AMBER improve diagnostic performance, whereas a loss of information is found if the AMBER system is combined with lower contrast films.
Authors: Juergen Biederer; Tobias Gottwald; Hendrik Bolte; Christian Riedel; Sandra Freitag; Richard Van Metter; Martin Heller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-09 Impact factor: 5.315